manoj:
> >>"Arto" == Arto Astala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>
> Oh.
I know, I was daring, I wanted to try it out and,
essentially, nothing very bad happened, since I was
able to recover with reasonable amount of work.
> Arto> [...]
>
> The reason that the script asks a
> "Arto" == Arto Astala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arto> When configuring kernel it asks if I want to make boot disk.
Arto> I did want. Then it asks something like "Hmm. You seem to
Arto> have new superformat, want to use it?" and I felt I'm taking
Arto> risks already and I do
Hi,
Please do not blame Herbert for this, since I am responsible
for the kernel-image scripts.
>>"Arto" == Arto Astala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arto> I upgraded to a new snapshot of hamm (1997-12-13) and dselect
Arto> naturally marked for upgrade everything I had. I also noticed
Arto>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Alexander Supalov wrote:
> >
> > I saw today that Linux kernel 2.0.32 had been released as a Debian
> > package. Is it safe to upgrade the existing Debian.1.3.r4 to this
> > kernel? What about all the libc6 stuff? Should I have it installed or
> > should I better wait until the
Alexander Supalov wrote:
>
> I saw today that Linux kernel 2.0.32 had been released as a Debian
> package. Is it safe to upgrade the existing Debian.1.3.r4 to this
> kernel? What about all the libc6 stuff? Should I have it installed or
> should I better wait until the the next major Debian release
Vtk would fit in non-free. I think it's worth it to ask them to modify
their license to fit the DFSG, I'll fire off a note. This probably means
changes in diff files only (which Ian hates, but I still think is a good
compromise).
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
Dear Gurus,
I saw today that Linux kernel 2.0.32 had been released as a Debian
package. Is it safe to upgrade the existing Debian.1.3.r4 to this
kernel? What about all the libc6 stuff? Should I have it installed or
should I better wait until the the next major Debian release arrives?
If so, when w
7 matches
Mail list logo
