Hi Jonas,
Le 17/03/2021 à 18:35, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2021-03-17 16:52:38)
>> I've been confronted with an issue affecting a number of node-*
>> packages (and maybe others): apt is unable to parse the Build-Depends
>> field, making `apt build-dep`
Hi David,
Le 17/03/2021 à 19:22, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
>> I've been confronted with an issue affecting a number of node-* packages
>> (and maybe others): apt is unable to parse the Build-Depends field,
>> making `ap
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
> I've been confronted with an issue affecting a number of node-* packages
> (and maybe others): apt is unable to parse the Build-Depends field,
> making `apt build-dep` effectively unusable with those packages.
>
> One good exa
Hi Arnaud,
Quoting Arnaud Ferraris (2021-03-17 16:52:38)
> I've been confronted with an issue affecting a number of node-*
> packages (and maybe others): apt is unable to parse the Build-Depends
> field, making `apt build-dep` effectively unusable with those
> packages.
You seem to be reportin
Hi,
I've been confronted with an issue affecting a number of node-* packages
(and maybe others): apt is unable to parse the Build-Depends field,
making `apt build-dep` effectively unusable with those packages.
One good example is node-ramda[1]: as the first non-space character apt
encounters when
5 matches
Mail list logo