Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread Rahul Jain
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:29:17PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:22:33PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote: > > package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian > > package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there > > already a maintainer? can this pa

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread Joost Kooij
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:22:33PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote: > package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian > package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there > already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized? Alas, you hit on a faq. Please look at: http:

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Makholm
MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian > package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there > already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized? Please read http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package Make

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 07 May 2001, MaD dUCK wrote: > already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized? See: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package People should be using ogg instead of mp3 anyway (unless an ogg-less hardware device is involved in the chain). -- "One disk to rule them all, On

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach David Whedon (on Mon, 07 May 2001 01:10:02PM -0700): > Lame cannot be included in Debian, please see: > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package thanks for the reply(ies). i hope i didn't inconvenience anyone with my ignorant post. i'll be better in the future, promise! mart

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread David Whedon
Lame cannot be included in Debian, please see: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package -David Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:22:33PM -0400 wrote: > hi developers, > this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going > on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread MaD dUCK
hi developers, this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there already a mainta