Hi,
> Where stability is relative to the filesystem. :)
>
> I actually would like to see the latest xfsprogs in etch simply
> because they contain fixes for the recent XFS kernel bugs, so if
> you've been bitten, you can at least get your data back.
>
I've also run into problems with xfs due t
also sprach Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.2218 +0800]:
> With 2.6.17-stable bug -- corrected file system, so one will not
> have unpleasant log messages futher. This is a problem of
> *testers*, who was affected by that bug. It was said version .10
> corrects fs, but i saw people, who
On 2006-11-18, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> also sprach Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.1204 +0100]:
>> True; but IMO xf
also sprach Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.18.1204 +0100]:
> True; but IMO xfsprogs is relatively stable,
Where stability is relative to the filesystem. :)
I actually would like to see the latest xfsprogs in etch simply
because they contain fixes for the recent XFS kernel bugs, so if
y
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> xfsprogs-2.8.16 (30 October 2006)
>- Fix up an endian problem for nlink setting in phase 7 for xfs_repair.
Likely a grave bug on some archs.
> xfsprogs-2.8.15 (19 October 2006)
>- Fix up nlink checks and repairs in phase 7 for xfs_repair.
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006, Michael Banck wrote:
> We are preparing a release, so packaging new upstream versions is much
> less of a target right now than fixing bugs.
True; but IMO xfsprogs is relatively stable, and the changes are
usually bug fixes. I grabbed the tarballs to make sure
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 06:23:42AM +, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Hallo. I'm new here, let me in, please.
>
> xfsprogs debian's maintainer left SGI and i don't know if he announced
> anything about debian. Version in unstable is .11, while in upstream
> it's already .16.
>
> util-linux maintaining a
Hallo. I'm new here, let me in, please.
xfsprogs debian's maintainer left SGI and i don't know if he announced
anything about debian. Version in unstable is .11, while in upstream
it's already .16.
util-linux maintaining as in upstream as in debian isn't good, also.
Last one i'll try to update. A
8 matches
Mail list logo
