Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
> > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
> > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
> > their use of Debian, not just the application.
>
> No. They would b
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
> > If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
> > Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
> > their use of Debian, not jus
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
their use of Debian, not just the application.
No. They would be justified in que
* Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
> If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
> Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
> their use of Debian, not just the application.
No. They would be justified in questioning their o
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:26:13 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Harmful to Debian even if possibly not harmful to the user. This
> could be clarified in the next DWN article on the topic (now that
> Rudi has started the debate again another DWN article is probably
> due anyway).
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:25, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful".
> It should have been replaced, attributed or removed. I wondered about it
> at the time but didn't comment as the article had already been released.
> But maybe it can
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful".
I don't. Some people do use these applications for purposes more important
than chatting with friends. If someone missed a meeting because a
program t
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful".
>
> I would definitely consider an easter egg that disables the package
> to be "harmful". By contrast
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:25:11PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I wouldn't call it malicious, but I question the use of the word "harmful".
I would definitely consider an easter egg that disables the package
to be "harmful". By contrast, an easter egg that makes a little penguin
dance aroun
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:57:25 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> > d) the libel published in the Debian Weekly News of 2003-02-18; cf
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg01391.html
> >
> > .. none of those can be fix
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:36:30PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> It's kinda overdue, which is why I'm asking. I now have the missing
> translations for a few new strings so that I can activate the code that uses
> them in the stable branch. But the fixes are not that many yet that waiting
> for
>--[Robert Lemmen]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > couple of non-intentional errors (buffer overruns, null-dereferences, etc)
> > If you really found some that haven't been fixed in the meanwhile, you could
> > send them to me so that
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:07:28PM +0200, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> > couple of non-intentional errors (buffer overruns, null-dereferences, etc)
>
> If you really found some that haven't been fixed in the meanwhile, you could
> send them to me so that I can fix them for the next update.
we wanted
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rüdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> c) the slander on this mailing list, in particular by Steve Langasek,
> Russel Cooker and Manoj Srivastava
Unable to spell?
Which statements made by me, Steve, and Manoj do you claim to be false?
Why do you believe that I want to maliciously d
>--[Robert Lemmen]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > can you please inform the list and me about the current status of the
> > mICQ code audit you two wanted to do? It's been a while and I didn't
> > hear anything further from you since
15 matches
Mail list logo
