Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On 12/03/14 09:24, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Simon McVittie [140311 12:21]: >> Russ said >>> I think we only want to do this check if the first line of the >>> Changes file says UNRELEASED, since there are valid use cases >>> for a mismatch otherwise. > > I have a package which branched

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-12 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Simon McVittie [140311 12:21]: > Russ said > > I think we only want to do this check if the first line of the > > Changes file says UNRELEASED, since there are valid use cases for a > > mismatch otherwise. > > but I don't know what those valid use-cases are. BinNMUs in testing > for a package u

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Next time, dput-ng checks for this :) Cheers, Paul On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > "Distribution: unstable". Whoops. It is far too easy to make this > mistake with sbuild if you're not quite paying absolutely perfect > attention. My apologies ... > > Anyway, while t

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Simon McVittie writes: > On 11/03/14 10:50, Colin Watson wrote: >> "Distribution: unstable". Whoops. It is far too easy to make this >> mistake with sbuild if you're not quite paying absolutely perfect >> attention. My apologies ... > On the Lintian side of things, I attached a patch to >

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]"): > On the sbuild side: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529281 > > tl;dr: extensive discussion of why this mistake is easy to make and > why sbuild can&#x

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Simon McVittie
On 11/03/14 10:50, Colin Watson wrote: > "Distribution: unstable". Whoops. It is far too easy to make > this mistake with sbuild if you're not quite paying absolutely > perfect attention. My apologies ... On the Lintian side of things, I attached a patch to

Re: [cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:50:46AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > Anyway, while this was unintentional, I don't think it's actually > dreadful. testing has 2.00-22, which is reasonably solid, and I wanted > to make sure wheezy ships with at least GRUB 2.02 anyway, Cyril points out that I mean jessi

[cjwat...@debian.org: Accepted grub2 2.02~beta2-7 (source i386)]

2014-03-11 Thread Colin Watson
"Distribution: unstable". Whoops. It is far too easy to make this mistake with sbuild if you're not quite paying absolutely perfect attention. My apologies ... Anyway, while this was unintentional, I don't think it's actually dreadful. testing has 2.00-22, which is reasonably solid, and I want