On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Pointers to said discussion would be helpful.
http://bugs.debian.org/691148
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On 27-05-13 13:30, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> On Monday 27 May 2013 12:45:27 Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Montag, 27. Mai 2013, Frank Mehnert wrote:
>>> EFI in VirtualBox has definitely not the same level of stability as the
>>> normal BIOS. I would strongly discourage from publishing an EFI-only
>>> Vir
On Monday 27 May 2013 12:45:27 Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 27. Mai 2013, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> > EFI in VirtualBox has definitely not the same level of stability as the
> > normal BIOS. I would strongly discourage from publishing an EFI-only
> > VirtualBox package.
>
> so making it the defa
Hi,
On Montag, 27. Mai 2013, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> EFI in VirtualBox has definitely not the same level of stability as the
> normal BIOS. I would strongly discourage from publishing an EFI-only
> VirtualBox package.
so making it the default and moving virtualbox back to main would give this
ins
Hi,
On Saturday 18 May 2013 22:03:08 Felix Geyer wrote:
> On 18.05.2013 20:04, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >> However, Watcom is needed only for 16-bit code, and VirtualBox has an
> >> EFI mode. Would it be possible to restrict it to EFI only in main,
> >> unless the BIOS from contrib is loaded?
>
5 matches
Mail list logo