Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I made a proposal of an updated deb format definition. I based that on
> the manpage deb (part of dpkg-dev), and on reverse engineering of
> dpkg-deb/build.c. I hope I've written the standard in a right and easy
> to understandable way. I did (b
Previously Andreas Barth wrote:
> IMHO this definition should become part of the policy; I propose
> either an new chapter 12, or an addition to chapter 3 Binary packages,
It should be part of the dpkg reference manual (partially online at
www.dpkg.org). Patches against the text as you can find in
Hi,
I made a proposal of an updated deb format definition. I based that on
the manpage deb (part of dpkg-dev), and on reverse engineering of
dpkg-deb/build.c. I hope I've written the standard in a right and easy
to understandable way. I did (by purpose) not add anything about
signatures etc, but I
3 matches
Mail list logo
