OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Frank and all.
>
> # I'm reading debian-tex-maint.
>
> From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:15 +0200
>
&g
Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Frank K?ster:
>
> > in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been
> > basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the
> > list which is listed as maintainer are v
Hi, Frank and all.
# I'm reading debian-tex-maint.
From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:15 +0200
> We offer to do the same with jadetex, if Ohura thinks this is the way to
> go.
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Frank Küster:
> in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been
> basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the
> list which is listed as maintainer are very rare. jadetex is actually
> maintained by you,
Hi everybody,
in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been
basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the
list which is listed as maintainer are very rare. jadetex is actually
maintained by you, Ohura-san, but maybe gets not as much care as it
could
5 matches
Mail list logo
