Re: /usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale

1996-08-16 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
You (Christophe Le Bars) wrote: > > Doesn't glibc use /usr/share/locale, too? > > Well, I don't know... I do. That's the reason I started this thread: should it or shouldn't it? I've deciced it should, and I'm configuring glibc to use /usr/share. Now should we move /usr/lib/zoneinfo too? What

Re: /usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale

1996-08-16 Thread Christophe Le Bars
> Doesn't glibc use /usr/share/locale, too? Well, I don't know... > The only difference I'm aware of > is /usr/share/i18n instead of /usr/share/nls. But then this already holds > for libc5 starting with 5.4.0 The next wg15-locale package must provide a symbolic link then (/usr/share/i18

Re: /usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale

1996-08-15 Thread Michael Meskes
Christophe Le Bars writes: > wg15-locale install locale files in /usr/share/locale > # dpkg -S /usr/share/locale > wg15-locale: /usr/share/locale > > libc6 must conflict with wg15-locale (<1-2) if the locale > directory change... Doesn't glibc use /usr/share/locale, too? The only difference I'm a

Re: /usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale

1996-08-15 Thread Christophe Le Bars
**On 14 Aug, In article "/usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale", ** MVS (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes: MVS>A quick question (probably directed most at Ian). I notice that MVS>/usr/lib/locale is part of the base system, but that nothing uses it. MVS> MVS>OTOH, some pa

/usr/lib/locale and /usr/share/locale

1996-08-14 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
Hello all, A quick question (probably directed most at Ian). I notice that /usr/lib/locale is part of the base system, but that nothing uses it. OTOH, some packages do provide /usr/share/locale: $ dpkg -S /usr/share/locale textutils, fileutils, sharutils: /usr/share/locale I have to decide what