(CC to @paravoid as original reporter of the same issue)
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:04:42AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> This sort of thing needs to happen upstream first.
I reported it, without noticing that they had the same report third
time, and it was not a charm, still marked as wontfix for co
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:03 AM Yao Wei wrote:
> Worked this around in 3.5.0+dfsg1-1 upload, by supplying a wrapper
> script `afdko`, and moving all the binaries into /usr/libexec/afdko/ .
>
> If a font needs afdko to build one need to put /usr/libexec/afdko/ into
> their PATH.
This sort of thing
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:26AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> Probably making all the commands in the afdko package subcommands of a
> new afdko command would be the way to go (similar to how git uses
> subcommands).
Worked this around in 3.5.0+dfsg1-1 upload, by supplying a wrapper
script `af
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:52:15PM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:48 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > If we start allowing conflicts between completely unrelated packages
> > it might not end well in the long run.
>
> We already have had situations where related packages effecti
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:48 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Policy says this is not an option, and I agree with policy.
Hmm, I thought Policy was amended to allow it, woops.
> If we start allowing conflicts between completely unrelated packages
> it might not end well in the long run.
We already have
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:35:35AM +0800, Yao Wei wrote:
>...
> I am currently considering doing it by moving all binaries of afdko from
> /usr/bin to /usr/bin/afdko, and then creating another package
> afdko-legacy, that, similar to node-legacy before node changed the name
> to ax25-node, symlinks
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:26AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:40 AM Yao Wei wrote:
>
> > There's a serious bug when I am uploading afdko package, that one of the
> > binaries in this package "tx" has name conflicting with
> > transifex-client.
>
> As transifex-client is c
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:40 AM Yao Wei wrote:
> There's a serious bug when I am uploading afdko package, that one of the
> binaries in this package "tx" has name conflicting with
> transifex-client.
As transifex-client is client for the proprietary Transifex service,
personally I would just add
Hi,
There's a serious bug when I am uploading afdko package, that one of the
binaries in this package "tx" has name conflicting with
transifex-client.
https://bugs.debian.org/965151
I am currently considering doing it by moving all binaries of afdko from
/usr/bin to /usr/bin/afdko, and then cr
9 matches
Mail list logo
