Re: /usr/bin/mail policy

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article > you wrote: >> Since heirloom-mailx (and any mailx following the POSIX spec) doesn't >> have a way to specify extra headers > > What about using /usr/sbin/sendmail? Currently, our mail sending mechanisms fall into two categori

Re: /usr/bin/mail policy

In article you wrote: > Since heirloom-mailx (and any mailx following the POSIX spec) doesn't > have a way to specify extra headers What about using /usr/sbin/sendmail? Gruss Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Re: /usr/bin/mail policy

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > bts from devscripts invokes mail with an -a flag, which has different > meanings in bsd-mailx and heirloom-mailx (the latter being some > sort-of-default in squeeze installations, apparently). This has been brought up in #577564 as well. T

/usr/bin/mail policy

bts from devscripts invokes mail with an -a flag, which has different meanings in bsd-mailx and heirloom-mailx (the latter being some sort-of-default in squeeze installations, apparently). I'm not sure which package is at fault here. Any suggestions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-re