Re: Bug#628953: O: mercurial-buildpackage -- Utillities for maintaining a deb package in Hg repository

On 2011-06-03 10:39, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: > Jens, I always wanted to ask, why doesn't it sign the .dsc/.changes > files? It does not sign the result because I believe that signing a package should only happen after it has been tested, as a conscious decision. YMMV :-) Cheers, /JP signatur

Bug#628953: O: mercurial-buildpackage -- Utillities for maintaining a deb package in Hg repository

ch I have started taking care of these problems, but you will need a good deal of dedication. I will help if needed. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d

Bug#628948: O: haxe -- Compiler for the Web-oriented haXe programming language

hassle because the porters apparently cannot fix it. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#628943: O: trayer -- lightweight GTK-based systray

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, responsive (new) upstream. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628942: O: sml-mode -- Emacs mode for Standard-ML programming

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, very low upstream activity. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628941: O: siggen -- Signal generation tools

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, very low activity upstream. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628939: O: neko -- Virtual machine (byte code), interpreter and compiler

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, upstream responsive, low activity. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ

Bug#628938: O: lua-mode -- Emacs mode for Lua programming

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, unclear upstream development. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628937: O: libpam-ssh -- Use SSH keys to login and enable eg. single sign-on

Package: wnpp Severity: normal pam-ssh has unclear upstream development, has a lot of Debian changes, and in general need a firm hand. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To

Bug#628936: O: libfile-ncopy-perl -- Perl library for extended file copy functionality

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package has not been touched for years, very low activity upstream. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ

Bug#628935: O: libcrypto++ -- C++ class library of cryptographic schemes

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, upstream responsive and has a Debian guest account for debugging failures. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#628924: O: changetrack -- automatic log book, recording what files were changed

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, very low maintenance. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#628923: O: budy -- Binary Decision Diagram library

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package in good shape, very low activity. -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#628920: O: asunder -- GTK Audio CD ripper and encoder

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Asunder is in good shape, upstream is responsive (and would like to not have his email made public). -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

libcrypto++8/9 transition

up things for you or you do not have time to test out things before March, please shout out. Cheers, - -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10

Re: Ideas for object-based git-like storage on Linux

On 2011-2-8 0:51 , Roger Leigh wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:53:46PM +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote: Interesting! It seems that it would also be beneficial to log-structured file systems [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-structured_file_system Cheers, /JP -- Jens Peter Secher

Re: Ideas for object-based git-like storage on Linux

therefore be replaced" Page 8: "that is to say it it written once" => "that is to say it is written once" "storage is be used" => "storage is used" Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A. Because it breaks the logical

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

rated patch to something meaningful. But I would like to hear suggestions for improvements... Ohh, and thanks to Raphael Hertzog for doing all the hard work on the new formats! Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5

QA pages and epochs: problem?

? -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: mercurial-buildpackage, now with pristine-tar support

it is installed. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? [1] http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian

mercurial-buildpackage, now with pristine-tar support

no more needed to do special initialisation of a Mercurial repository; simply do a "hg init mypack" to start a package. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it

Re: ITP: mercurial-buildpackage (for those who care about Mercurial)

2009/11/21 Goswin von Brederlow : > Jens Peter Secher writes: >> As I see it, there is no need for using Mercurial Queues (mq) with >> mercurial-buildpackage because dpkg-source format "3.0 (quilt)" has >> the same purpose as mq, namely to wrap around quilt to achi

Re: ITP: mercurial-buildpackage (for those who care about Mercurial)

2009/11/19 Goswin von Brederlow : > Jens Peter Secher writes: [...] >>  * Support dpkg source format 3.0. > > Integration of the hg stacked patches extenstion (don't remember the > name, the one giving you qpull/qpush) with 3.0 (quilt) format? As I see it, there is no n

ITP: mercurial-buildpackage (for those who care about Mercurial)

repository has uncommited changes (unless --force). * Only one repository. Branches are used to keep upstream separate. I will now work on getting backporting, downstreaming (Ubuntu etc.) to be a breeze (breezy?) too. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher, GPG fingerprint 0EE5978AFE63E8A1. A

Re: trayer_1.1_i386.changes REJECTED

Agile person... But I figured that fighting about it was even more work than going with the path system. So, I have now uploaded a non-native package. Side-note: I am hacking away on a new version of hg-buildpackage but have not yet been in touch with John Goerzen about this because it is not

Re: trayer_1.1_i386.changes REJECTED

; Yep, you are right, these are indeed missing. I will now carefully check each file, add missing copyrights and upload again. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it

Re: piuparts output wishlist?

ernatively [I] Reading database ... 5834 files and directories currently installed. [I] Removing bla bla ... [I] Purging bla bla ... [W] Suspicious action bla bla ... [E] dpkg: error processing ucf (--remove) [E] bla bla... Cheers, -- Jens Peter

Re: postfix as default-mta? [Re: Bug#508644: new release goal default-mta?]

features, I still wonder why it > is not something like nullmailer or ssmtp. > +1 for ssmtp -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussio

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

have not had the time to test it on an actual XFS system. -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008/12/6 Allan Wind : > On 2008-12-03T23:19:52, Jens Peter Secher wrote: >> * No SSH passphrase will be asked if the user has no SSH keys. > > Is the idea to make the module optional if there is no private key? It > would be fine if the module is configured as opt

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

bjections. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008/12/4 Luca Niccoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/12/4 Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> To do that you will need to change /etc/pam.d/ssh-auth to >> >> auth sufficient pam_ssh.so > > I know, that's why I'm not complaining =) > M

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008/12/4 Luca Niccoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/12/3 Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Because of the security implications of changing a PAM module, I would >> welcome some peer reviewing of the changes I have made. The new package >> has be

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008/12/4 Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:03:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > || On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:19:52PM +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > || > || > * The 'keyfiles' option is now obsolete. Instead the auth

For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

7;debug' option now works as advertised, and the output goes into /var/log/auth.log . * No SSH passphrase will be asked if the user has no SSH keys. Thanks in advance, /JP -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE

Bug#469993: ITP: siggen -- Waveform generation tools

Package: wnpp Owner: Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: siggen Version : 2.3.9 Upstream Author : Jim Jackson * URL or Web page : http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/jj/linux/siggen.html * License : GPL v2 Description : Wa

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

mpiler. So my question is, have others spotted similar problems, and if so in connection with Ocaml? -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discuss

Portability links in library and development packages?

++.so /usr/include/foopp --> foo++ I have a funny feeling that such links could break something, but I cannot find a case where it actually does. Can any of you? Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 j

Re: pbuilder build with passing -sa option

x27;-sa -v1.5-1' when doing backports. -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

ITP: neko -- High-level dynamically typed programming language

Package: wnpp Owner: Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: neko Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse (Motion-Twin) * URL or Web page : http://nekovm.org * License : LGPL Description : High-level dynamically

Depends vs. Recommends (Was: Bug#378112: ITP: gzrt -- gzip recovery toolkit)

ncy system is used to make sure things don't break on the _system_ level. To ease upgrades, transitions, etc., dependencies (Depends) should be kept to the absolute minimum. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B5

Bug#365425: ITP: haxe -- Web programming languge generating Flash SWF

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: haxe Version : 0.b5 Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse * URL or Web page : http://haxe.org * License : GPL Description : Web programming languge generating Flash SWF haXe is a programming language similar to JavaScript

Re: GPG signing of debian packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Metzler wrote: > - I personally always run dpkg-buildpackage with -uc -us and use > debsign -kkeyid foo_changes to sign the /final/ packages > afterwards. I usually build the packages more than once before > uploading as I often find som

HPPA, Arm, or M68k with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 ?

I need to test that a package can be built with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 on HPPA, Arm, or M68k. Is there a DD accessible machine that has a current version of g++ installed? Cheers, /JP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/ --- Why ­­ /etc ?

n /etc. As an effect of this, I have had to special-case Gnome files in /etc in the changetrack package so that these files are ignored, which is obviously not ideal. -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1

Re: libcrypto++

not able to test my patch, which is > included below. I tried out your patch, but still get the same linking error, that is, undefined symbols. But thanks for the leads. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5

libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

o so with GCC4. I am still investigating... -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_ [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20589 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

OT: macs?

all kinds of vira after spending some time with it." -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: copyright vs. license

cation in a year not already mentioned > (without removing the old years, since the new publication is a > derived work). And remember that you need to brush your teeth before you go to bed. -- Jens Peter Secher _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B

Re: soname number in name of dev-package?

Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scripsit Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > But the advice in the library packaging guide is to do something like > > Package: libpackage2-dev > > Provides: libpackage-dev > > Conf

Re: soname number in name of dev-package?

bpackage-dev Conflicts: libpackage-dev which means that only one of the -dev packages can be installed on any one system. AFAICT the above approach offers nothing more than simply Package: libpackage-dev would do. Right? --

I am off-line January 10th-26th

If there are serious problems in the packages I maintain, then simply make an NMU. (Since I am not an official developer, I send this here. Sorry for the bother.) -- Jens Peter Secher

Re: System spec.'s

what, exactly are you looking for? Peace, Secher On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:01:45PM -0500, Sarah Nilles wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I have a customer that is already using the Debian-Linux. They want to > replace their server and that where I come in. Are there any special >