Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

2006-03-21 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 12:24:12AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > I hope that my patches (#357629, #357658 > > , #357661 > > ) are proper enough:-) > > This is incomplete: not only libgcc does not provide -dcv1

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-20 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 05:41:26PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em S?b, 2006-03-18 ?s 23:17 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu: > > Yes. However, I think that 'setting up buildd' is the least difficult > > of those tasks. It is by far more difficult to produce patches for all > > 'standard debian pack

Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

2006-03-16 Thread peter.kourzanov
I think I know now what the problem is, see below... On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:35:41PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > > As you see, I get depends with -dcv1 suffix as well as -cross suffix. > > Yes, it's exactly what it should do. > Each package xxx-arm-cross package created with dpkg

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-16 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:46:59PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em Seg, 2006-03-13 ?s 17:30 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu: > > Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > >This is a call for help :). If you want to help, just take over the task > > >of setting a uclibc-i386 buildd up. > > What is the need for buildd

Re: question on hurd-i386 Debian architecture

2006-03-16 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:39:41PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > >[2] http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html > > > This one looks dead. > > I understand we live in a gentoo-driven 0-day bleeding edge culture, but > this is quite spectacular deducment. SLIND was published exactly two > weeks ago in F

Re: cross-compiling Debian packages

2006-03-16 Thread peter.kourzanov
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:56:35PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > > > >You may look at dpkg-cross ... > > > > I did, and I'm using it, thanks:-) > > > > What is the deal BTW with that new rewrite_dependencies (as of 1.26) > > producing bogus names with > > -dcv1 suffix? I had to comment

Re: mipsel binutils/gcc/glibc shared library breakage

2005-03-10 Thread peter.kourzanov
Thiemo, The code builds OK. It even runs if I put less than 4 symbols in a shared library (it works with 3 symbols for sure). I presume multigot problem is unrelated to this... Pjotr Kourzanov On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:32:38AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Pjotr Kourzanov wrote: > > D