Package: dwww
Version: 1.0-1
1) While attempting to build "dwww" I received the following messages:
rm -f /home/httpd-data/dwww
ln -s debian/tmp/var/lib/dwww /home/httpd-data/dwww
ln: cannot create symbolic link `/home/httpd-data/dwww' to
`debian/tmp/var/lib/dwww
Package: mhonarc
Version: 1.2.3-2
1) When extracting "mhonarc", dpkg-source produced the following message:
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/mhonarc_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz'
contains object (mhonarc.orig/) not in expected directory
(mhonarc-1.2.3.orig)
--
TO UNSUBS
an
we? Please, please! B-)
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAI
Package: mpage
Versoin: 2.4-1
1) The work being done in the "binary-indep" target should be moved to
the "binary-arch" target since the is an architecture dependent package.
(Unless, the intent was to build an "mpage_2.4-1_i386.deb" and an
"mpage-doc_2.4-1_all.deb" package?)
--
T
Package: io
Version: 1.12-1
1) Since the package is architecture dependent, it should be built under
the "binary-arch" target rathar than the "binary-indep" one.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Package: saytime
Version: 1.0-1
1) "saytime" will not extract with dpkg-source due to a directory of
"saytime-1.0-0" in the ".orig.tar.gz" archive and because the ".diff.gz"
attempts to patch a directory called "saytime-1.0-1" when it should
"saytime-1.0". Also, the ".dsc" file is
Package: mailpgp
Version: 1.0-1
1) Source doesn't extract due to an invalid ".dsc" file and the
".diff.gz" patches reference a directory called "mailpgp-1.0-1" rather
than the expected "mailpgp-1.0".
2) Since the package doesn't contain any architecture dependent files,
it should
Package: lclint
Version: 2.1b-1
1) "lclint-doc" is built as architecture dependent when it's not.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: alias
Version: 2.1-2
1) "debian/rules" should build package in "binary-arch" target rather
than "binary-indep" since this is a arch dependent package.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: gawk
Version: 3.0.0-4
1) "debian/rules" clean target does not ignore errors when doing the
"make distclean" which causes the build to fail since there's nothing
to clean (not even a Makefile).
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PR
Package: csh
Version: 5.26-6
1) "debian/rules" does not contain the "binary-arch" and "binary-indep"
targets which prevents the use of:
dpkg-buildpackage -B
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, 28 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
> Package: netcdf
> Version: 2.4.3-1
>
> 1) "debian/rules" includes "-m486" in compile options.
> 2) "debian/rules" binary-arch target should build "netcdf" and
> "netcdf-dev" package
-doc" package.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o oo o o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
ules" is the culprit.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
nderstand it
rather than just accepting it...
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
On Sun, 22 Sep 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry it was the "-N" link option that causes "ae" to be linked
> > statically. Is it really necessary to use the option?
> >
> Well, my man page
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.4.0
1) "dpkg-buildpackage" is supposed to pass the v, m, and C flags to
"dpkg-genchanges", but it doesn't.
The following patch corrects this:
--- dpkg-buildpackage~ Wed Sep 11 17:20:10 1996
+++ dpkg-buildpackage Sun Sep 22 01:38:03 1996
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
>
> > Package: ae
> > Version: 962-9
> >
> > 1) "debian/rules" uses "dpkg-shlibdeps" as you normally would, but
> > for "ae" it's not ne
Package: ae
Version: 962-9
1) "debian/rules" uses "dpkg-shlibdeps" as you normally would, but
for "ae" it's not necessary since "ae" is compiled statically.
Unfortunately, "dpkg-shlibdeps" does not handle this case.
The following patch corrects the problem:
diff -ruN orig/ae-962/debian/r
Package: sac
Version: 1.3.1-1
1) "Makefile" contains architecture dependent compile option.
The following patch corrects this:
--- orig/sac-1.3.1/debian/rules Sat Sep 21 11:20:47 1996
+++ sac-1.3.1/debian/rules Sat Sep 21 16:32:55 1996
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
build:
$(checkdir)
-
On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
>
> > When attempting to extract the source for eject_1.4-1, I received the
> > following message:
> >
> > dpkg-source: error: diff contains unknown line `\ No newline at end of file
a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
eanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
Package: io
Version: 1.09-1
The following message was received while extracting the source:
# dpkg-source -x /sys/downloads/io_1.09-1.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/io_1.09.orig.tar.gz' contains
object (IO-1.09.orig/) not in expected directory (io-1.09.orig)
It appears the direc
On 19 Sep 1996, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> llucius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package: libpng1
> > Version: 0.89c-1
> > While building on the m68k arch, I received the following from dpkg:
> > dpkg --build /bld/src/new/libpng-0.89c/debian/tmp ..
> >
Package: dhcpd
Version: 0.5.13-1
The following message was received while extracting the source:
# dpkg-source -x /sys/downloads/dhcpd_0.5.13-1.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/dhcpd_0.5.13.orig.tar.gz'
contains object (dhcpd_0.5.13.orig/) not in expected directory
(dhcpd-0.5.13.or
anest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
y diff as appended
> Heiko
Cool! I'll give it a try.
Thanks!
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius
sions 644 (must be
>=0555 and <=0775)
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
me know? I've run
into the same problem while rebuilding for m68kers and was unable to
determine the cause.
Thanks,
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -
oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
rs since the upload date was Aug 9th. It worked for me
anyway.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
rth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
-- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
weet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
-)
Thanks for noticing...
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
40 matches
Mail list logo
