; > end of this week, we will take over the package as it's blocking bzr
>
> He was moving cross-country in May, so I suggest you NMU for now.
Would NMUing a new upstream be ok in this instance then?
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
gree the
description needs to be improved, good luck coming up with something
descriptive though.
Wouter van Heyst
would cross my mind initially.
Do people interpret the phrase negatively otherwise?
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCC does C scripting, but it's nowhere near as complete as GCC and while
> it runs much faster, the resulting code is not optimized at all and runs
> very slowly.
Are you sure? http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/tcc/ claims it produces
optimized x86 code, which could be a problem on other arch
be useful (and I agree with not trying to become upstream,
unless the OP is part of such a project already)
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e program's branding depend on argv[0].
Do trademarks only apply to binaries, or to source also? A running
firefox will prominently display the trademarked bits in question, but
hey, the source being open for viewing is important here.
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e to give Debian a chance to fix its
> release cycle problems and, better yet, to try to help fix them,
> rather than simply saying "Debian is too slow/unpredictable for us"?
Pardon me, but wouldn't hoary and sarge be (roughly) compatible, and
breezy with etch (hoping on a slightl
my curiosity again, could you point me some precise
> examples?
Gcc compiling not so correct C++ code.
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kward situation for installation, and
The awkwad situation would be that d-i is part of Debian, and non-free
isn't, so anything in non-free can not be part of the installer?
But having a (non-free) firmware section with components of that in the
installer is ok?
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNS
ntoo-Way looks better than this.
What is the Gentoo-Way?
Wouter van Heyst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of the
>pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies, ignores
>/chapter and verse/ of policy, ...), so we can safely rule that one
>out
I ha
11 matches
Mail list logo