On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:47, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>> In a new temp directory do:
>>
>> GNUPGHOME=$(pwd) gpg-agent --daemon gpg .
>>
>> Or whatever you want to run under gpg-agent's control. This has been
>> there for ages.
>
> fwiw, this doesn't work (and actually returns an error) if
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:17, ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk said:
> authorisations, if the user types in a passphrase) have a lifetime
> limited by that of the gpg process which started the agent.
In a new temp directory do:
GNUPGHOME=$(pwd) gpg-agent --daemon gpg .
Or whatever you want to
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:24, p...@debian.org said:
> BTW, does this make parcimonie obsolete? I noticed that dirmngr
We plan to add similar fucntionality to dirmngr but that has not yet
been done and I am not sure whether we will have it for 2.2.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind fr
Hi,
I do not think that it is a good idea to push for 4k RSA keys! You gain
nothing from it except for slowness on small devices. Debian is used on
a lot of small devices. Further DDs are strongly represented in the WoT
and thus many keyrings will increase in size and checking all the
signatures
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:26:02 +0100, Matthias Urlichs said:
> I'm also a bit concerned about MitM attacks; the hash-or-whatever which
Obviously you can do this only using a secure channel.
> the local side is supposed to sign should probably be encrypted with the
> signer's public key, otherwise I
o add some more data. Creating an incomplete hash on the remote
machine is not the cleanest solution, so I have to come up with a
better way.
Werner
--
Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The GnuPG Expertshttp://g10
6 matches
Mail list logo
