Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I > > > tried t

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Erik Steffl wrote: > Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > IMO IMAP

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box > > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with > > uw-imapd which is about as configurable as you