. I suspect if you rm K09reboot in
the squeeze chroot, it will fix the behaviour to what you want.
As far as rebooting from inside a chroot rebooting the system I don;t
know whether that's a bug or not. As far as I'm aware it has been the
way it's behaved for a long while...not
image.
It's a very handy place to put modules which should be loaded at boot.
Please don't remove it.
Cheers,
Stephen
--
Stephen Stafford
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:14:08AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Come on! The FHS regulates what normal software can/should do,
partially so that package managers can work reliably. dpkg is the
package manager, thus it is exempt from the FHS.
In fact, I should have been even cl
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:35:12PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> [ Please do not send me CC's, as I have not explicitly asked for them. ]
Apologies.
>
> * Stephen Stafford
>
> > Sorry, but I do NOT see how this is a grave bug. It's wishlist (at best).
> >
[enormous snippage]
Sorry, but I do NOT see how this is a grave bug. It's wishlist (at best).
YOU might not agree that C-R systems are good (personally I detest them),
but that does NOT mean that we shouldn't release one. If the package is in
good shape and functions as advertised, then it IS f
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:12:44PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 07:03 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> >Just don't *dare* to let anyone remove /usr/bin/google or I'll kill
> >you,
> >your dog and your friend's uncle's son's ex-roommate's girlfriend's
> >aunt's
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:59:07AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Ignacio Garc?a Fern?ndez wrote:
>
> > It would be nice that there was one design in pgn or something
>
> (...ponders what a T-shirt design in chess notation would look like...)
>
I used t
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:10:12PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Stephen Stafford]
> > We have a commitment that everything in Debian main is Free. Since
> > the RFC license is NOT Free, it can't be in main. This does NOT
> > imply anything about the usefulness o
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:47:19PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> To require or demand that the IETF changes their copyright policy or
> their publishing practices to cater to someone else's idea of what the
> document should be used for is plain arogance. Respect the wishes of
> the original auth
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-03
Severity: wishlist
Package name: rhyme
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Brian (tuffy) Langenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rhyme
License : GPL
Description : console base
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > What about perusing the INT 6 idea, and going all the way up to i686?
> > While I su
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:26:08PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>
> Stephen Stafford wrote:
>
> >While I support the removal of 386 support, I absolutely and strenuously
> >object to going to 686. 686 isn't all that old at all (1997 IIRC), and I
> >use a n
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > In any case we need to make clear if we allow 486 optimisation that
> > are not i386 compatible or not.
> What about perusing the INT 6 idea, and going all the way up to i686?
> As i686 is already like ten(?) years old, I would say
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:16:07PM +0100, Stephen Stafford wrote:
>
> I just say the consequences of that choice, that is you're having
> problems with an old version and you don't have the freedom to fix
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:25:47PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:47:42PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
> > the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else
> > with your vmware
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:03:11AM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:01:00AM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Phillips) writes:
> > Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> >
> > > As SUSv2 mandates that new nice return value is correct,
> > > please use [EMAIL PROTEC
rthern Ireland}]
2: an island comprising England and Scotland and Wales [syn:
{Great Britain}]
The line *does* seem rather blurry. Personally I use the two terms
interchangeably. Others like to be more exact about it.
- --
Stephen Stafford
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get gpg public key
--
utilities need to be more well ducumented. Is there a list, anywhere,
> of all these obscure? utilites that I seem to only find when it's too
> late?
grep-available -Ps Package dpkg
grep-available -Ps Package apt
--
Stephen Stafford
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get gpg public key
I su
18 matches
Mail list logo
