Re: Why is irqbalance package so out of date?

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:56:18 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I will be happy to get involved; upstream irqbalance is on my list > > of things that are broken and needs to be fixed. Will try and get a hold > > C

Re: Why is irqbalance package so out of date?

On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:53:02 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 08:54 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/ > > The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old) > > and upstream is

Re: Why is irqbalance package so out of date?

> As someone else pointed out, it would help if the maintainers got > their > act together and made irqbalance.org point to this. It's not as if > they're unassociated with the owner of that domain. Maybe I need to take a trip over and knock on the door... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: Why is irqbalance package so out of date?

On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:08:14 -0400 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > may be because > > $> links -dump https://irqbalance.org/download.html | grep -A2 Latest > Latest release > >Source Code: irqbalance-0.56.tar.bz2 (28Kb) > > ? The project home page moved. The old one is out of date. -- To U

Why is irqbalance package so out of date?

Irqbalance project has moved to http://code.google.com/p/irqbalance/ The current Debian package is back at 0.56 (over 2yrs old) and upstream is now at version 1.0.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li