Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2005-05-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: elektra
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Avi Alkalay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://elektra.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : A framework to store configurat
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:56:21PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> now, if the apt method kept a timestamp of the last successful update,
> it could send as part of the ldap query filter something like
> '(debTimeStamp>$lasttime)'. this would make keeping debian up to
> date over dialup a much easier
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:47:38AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> please, please treat this machine politely. it's my workstation and
> i have no qualms with turning off slapd if it's getting in the
> way :)
If you're using OpenLDAP, there is no way that this could ever be fast.
But, your idea is n
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-11-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xplc
Version : 0.9.10
Upstream Author : Pierre Phaneuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xplc.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Description : Light weight component system
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:21:10PM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> I could not reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is mentioned
> on the following page:
> http://people.debian.org/~apenwarr/popcon/
Avery is a little busy right now. But he can probably be
reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon
M-F-T set to debian-project.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:35:14PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > The old Open Use logo was not DFSG-free, so we really shouldn't be
> > shipping it in main.
>
> Where are we shippi
Debian Open Use Logo License
Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
-This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the
-Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project.
+This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone, but does not
+indicate
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:05:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
>
> > Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
> > in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. T
Hi guys,
Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. They
are asking that tvtime Suggests libdscaler. I thought that the
appropriate thing to do was to have libdscaler Extends tvtime.
My impres
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
> The announcement tells we should get out "-snapshot" from the name of
> the package, before puting it in experimental. So there is no
> difference in the package name anymore. So now, since cvs package
> version is 0.0.date, apt always ask
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:24:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[snip]
> ==
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:43:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:43:34AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > It's already packaged:
> [...]
>
> > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > apt-cache show kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
> > Package: kernel-patch-lowlatency-2.4
>
> Oops ! Sorry
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
> > non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
> > part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the app
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 18:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It would also be nice to have some blessing of /run in the policy first,
> > but that doesn't seem terribly likely.
>
> What is more important for now is whether there is broad
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:01:35AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 08:58, LapTop006 wrote:
> > I use both Mutt and OE to read my E-mail (mostly mutt). The one feature
> > OE has (on both mac and windows) that NO other client I've seen matches
> > (Mozilla 1.0 came close, ha
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add
> >themselves by sending a mail in certain format to something like
> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Only after that w
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 04:16:57AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:34:36PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > Debian can't legally distribute such an info document. Because the
> > GFDL is incompatible with the GPL, it is prohibited to even
> > create an info document from
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >At some point in the future, we will change gcc-defaults to make
> >gcc-3.2 the default on all architectures. At that time, you should
> >remove the setting of CXX and the e
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> If i get no crash reports 'till Monday, I will upload my ZINF
> packages, assuming this is a local problem.
You most certainly want to test this in a chroot environment.
May I suggest using debootstrap or pbuilder to do th
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:36:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > Ben> "How am I going to deal with it when someone changes my font to
> > Ben> something ugly and it reflects poorly on my skills as a
> > Ben> fontographer?"
>
> > In
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:40:43AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> As the man page at http://libdnet.sourceforge.net/dnet.3.txt refers to the
> library as "dnet - dumb networking library" how about ren
I just got this message from debian-devel:
If you are running gnome-terminal, then can we merge the two bugs
together and call it fixed?
Simon
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:54:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 27 Dec 2001, Bill Gribble wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 10:54, Simon Law wrote:
> >Hrm... Could you list the output of `complete` and `set -o` for
> > me? I have the same inputrc, and am unable to reproduce the problem.
> > I am running libreadline4 4.2a-3 and
On 27 Dec 2001, Bill Gribble wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 10:29, Simon Law wrote:
> > Can we confirm whether this is a libreadline thing? It could be
> > bash's programmable completion feature. Has the user defined any
> > `complete`s? If so, maybe he should loo
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [CC to debian-devel, asking if report #126567 is reproduceable]
>
> Bill Gribble writes:
> > > I simply cannot reproduce the behaviour you describe.
> >
> > Well, why don't you describe for me what you have tried to do. "Simply
> > cannot reproduce"
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 01-May-01, 12:50 (CDT), Vince Mulhollon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 05/01/2001 12:40:24 PM roland wrote:
> > >> Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> > >> > From my poor memory, the "generally agreed best idea" is to setup two
> > >> > packages, vaguely li
Hello,
I'm the lucky new owner of a dual Pentium Pro system. It seems,
however, that compiling stuff just doesn't use my extra CPU. I know I
can compile with 'make -j 2' to use the second processor; but I don't
know how to convince kernel-package and dpkg-deb (apt-get source) to
do that
27 matches
Mail list logo
