As the sole driver and implementor of DEP9, I would like to see all reverse
depends of update-inetd migrate to reconf-inetd. That is, assuming inetd is
not entirely deprecated by systemd/upstart/whathaveyou by the time jessie is
released.
On a less boring note, I would like to see apt-listbugs bec
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:10:05PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with
> Invariant Sections or Cover Texts:
[..]
If I understand correctly, the way to go is to split every problematic source
package in two different source packages, one for main
[cc'ing the maintainers of openbsd-inetd & xinetd]
Hi,
DEP9 is implemented in the new package reconf-inetd (currently in unstable)
and is ready to be tested. I've opened wishlist bugs #660568 & #660569 for a
couple of "Depends: update-inetd" packages (the legacy tool to be replaced).
DEP0's crit
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:13:26AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 02/16/2012 12:22 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > hi Goswin,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote
> > [edited]:
> >> One thing though: Can I ad
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:41:40AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote [edited]:
[..]
> Putting local config into /usr/share is wrong though.
the answer to all local policy questions is: like you always did; you edit
inetd.conf.
/usr/share/reconf-inetd fragments are input to a *maintainer* tool. yo
hi Goswin,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote [edited]:
> One thing though: Can I add my own local fragments? Is there a fragment
> dir in /etc for that?
you can, and they should also go to /usr/share/reconf-inetd (as long as the
filenames don't conflict with any
Hi Ian,
First of all, thanks for the feedback.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:36:40PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Serafeim Zanikolas writes ("[DEP9] call for testing of reconf-inetd
> (update-inetd replacement)"):
> > To test it, in a nutshell:
> >
> > - make
Hi,
reconf-inetd is the replacement of update-inetd, as per DEP9. Unlike past
proposals for replacing update-inetd, this one is actually implemented and
available in experimental.
This should be of interest for services that
- require separate inetd.conf entries for ipv4/ipv6 versions
-
Hey all,
Maintainers of servers that may be invoked via inetd might want to checkout
DEP9, if not done so already. The implementation is not quite there yet but
there's been considerable progress during DebConf:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/reconf-inetd.git;a=summary
Even though the
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:51:45PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote [edited]:
> The burden of learning such basics lies with the contributor. Lack of
> such due diligence is not so welcomed.
Yes, lack of such due diligence is not welcome in -devel. But that doesn't
justify rudeness. If one is not patient
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote [edited]:
> Below an update of the release goals I advocated and some thoughts on
> others.
[..]
> For the IPv6 and LFS legacy release goals I think it would be best if we
A minor aspect of ipv6 support, is for maintainer scripts to be able
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:46AM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Serafeim Zanikolas writes:
> > sysv-rc-conf works for any symlink-based system.
>
> If you want to make sure that only carefully chosen services are ever
> running then you still need to maintain your ow
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote [edited]:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
[..]
> > Are you serious? How's that a sysadmin interface? Yes, everything can be
> > done using sh/cp/mv/vi, but this is hardly something that's either
> > p
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:37:25PM +, Simon McVittie wrote [edited]:
> (Cross-posting to d-d-games for discussion of the Quake III-based games)
>
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 at 15:20:52 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Speaking as someone who has a few of the DONT_NOT_DISABLE_SERVICE
> > variables in
Title: inet-superserver configuration by maintainer scripts
DEP: 9
State: DRAFT
Date: 2011-02-28
Drivers: Serafeim Zanikolas
URL: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8
License: http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
Abstract:
Motivation, requirements and functiona
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:44:10PM +, Chris Carr wrote [edited]:
> In both cases I ended up "pestering the team with newbie questions" because
> of the complexities of d-i and of packaging, respectively - not because I
> was unintelligent or unmotivated, nor because I had failed to read the
> a
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote [edited]:
> so googleearth-package was removed from squeeze, because of a RC bug, which
> was fixed on mentors.d.n for 4 days already when it was removed.
The sponsorship request should have been CC'ed to the RC bug report.
-S
--
To
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote [edited]:
> We should find a better way to identify firmware packages, allowing
> hw-detect to find the correct ones without unpacking.
Some options: an optional control field in binary packages or, perhaps better,
a debtags facet
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:32:49PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:52:43PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > >>>>> "LN" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> >
> > Milan Zamazal
> >cl-clx-sbcl
> >cl-flexi
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:52:43PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "LN" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>
> Milan Zamazal
>cl-clx-sbcl
>cl-flexichain
>cl-mcclim
>cl-mcclim-examples
>cl-spatial-trees
>cl-speech-dispatcher
>cl-swank (U)
>slime (U)
>
> These, as well
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:06:14AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > You assume that users know that we're willing to take bug reports.
>
> If you can come up with a good way to inform users of that without
> annoying users who already know that, by all means
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:16AM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote [edited]:
> A short update:
[..]
Great! You should report to the list at
http://workaround.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debexpo-devel
(hosted by the gsoc mentor of debexpo)
Cheers,
Serafeim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve
Hi Ola,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 04:55:43PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote [edited]:
> Bug#586410: RFA: ntop -- display network usage in top-like format
Has there been a resolution for possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl?
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi Jan,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:38:27PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> I'm experienced with Python + Pylons and used mentors.d.n quite regularly
> until
> I got a DD. I will have a look at the current code base as soon as I find some
> free time. Is there a list of current pending issues or id
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:13:35AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote [edited]:
> Some of the above is part of the proposed design for debexpo, which
> really needs folks to step up and work on it (hint hint).
No need for subtlety. debexpo is dead: it hasn't had a commit in 11 months.
debexpo needs a new pro
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:41:46AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Saturday 30 January 2010, Ben Finney wrote:
> > So, the version was upgraded to ‘1.2.1-1+b1’, but there latest
> > entry in the changelog is still only ‘1.4.1-1’. There is no entry
> > describing the changes in the latest releas
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 03:23:21AM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote [edited]:
> there are several tools that generate C source code that is later
> complied in object code, e.g. yacc, lex or valac. automake defaults to
> distribute these built intermediate files, so they are usually not
> regenerated
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:56:37AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Serafeim Zanikolas
>
> | The service supports no authorisation/authentication and, as of now, has no
> | way of limiting the size of inserted messages. Would it be acceptable if I
> | were to patch the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas
* Package name: flapjack
Version : 0.tag.0.5
Upstream Author : Lindsay Holmwood
* URL : http://flapjack-project.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : scalable and
Hi all,
I'm packaging an in-memory message queuing service [0] that ships tests, which
require listening on a non-privileged port for the 1-2 seconds that the tests
last.
The service supports no authorisation/authentication and, as of now, has no
way of limiting the size of inserted messages. Wou
Package: wnpp
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: beanstalkd
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Keith Rarick
* URL : http://xph.us/software/beanstalkd/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : simple, in-memory
[apologies for the late response]
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:35:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote [edited]:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:13:45AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote [edited]:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote [edited]:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > but the primary benefits are making inetd support in maintainer scripts
> > both robust and idempotent.
>
> update-inetd in its present form can already be us
tag 8927 + wontfix
thanks
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:30:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote [edited]:
> On Sep 04, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > * abolish /etc/inetd.conf and /etc/xinetd.d/ and instead auto-generate
> This is unacceptable, and I say this as the openbsd-inetd maint
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:02:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote [edited]:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:54:19PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Invocations of update-inetd that lead to local policy overrides are bugs in
> the caller, not in update-inetd. There is an explicitly reserve
Hello world,
As the new vict^Wmaintainer of update-inetd, I'd appreciate a review of the
proposal below to migrate it to dpkg triggers [0]
The Current Messy State of Affairs
update-inetd script is problematic (maintainer scripts use it to update the
/etc/inetd.conf conffile leading to local-poli
Hi,
Is it OK to reduce update-inetd's priority to optional, to agree with the
archive admin's override? (It should be, as all its rdepends are at most
optional)
It should be Priority: standard only if people use it interactively, and
expect it to be part of a standard installation (but I'm guessi
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:20:50PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote [edited]:
> can you please help to find the way which i can adopt an orphaned
In http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ read the parts related to ITA.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas
* Package name: pdfshuffler
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Konstantinos Poulios
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfshuffler
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: socnetv
Version : 0.44
Upstream Author : Dimitris Kalamaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://socnetv.sf.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:59:55AM -0500, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi Joey.
>
> Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
>
> > archivemail
Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-nodebox-web
Version : 1.9.2
Upstream Author : Tom De Smedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Web/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: indywiki
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Markos Gogoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http
afeim
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Fwd: greek translation in DDTP
Date: Saturday 18 December 2004 02:02
From: Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Michael (cc: to DDTP coordinators),
Can you ple
-
Subject: greek translation in DDTP
Date: Sunday 12 December 2004 01:54
From: Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm interested in translating the Debian package descriptions in greek, as
part of the DDTP. I can see that there is no greek
team in this pr
45 matches
Mail list logo
