Re: How to close bug #620550?

hi, I'm sorry that I've stopped its progress. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Keith Lawson writes ("How to close bug #620550?"): >> I'm looking for advice on how to get bug #620550[1] closed. This >> thread[2] on php-maint is the only record I can find of why PHP was >> swit

Re: A few observations about systemd

hi, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > When I install a package I want to actually use it. > A better security policy is to not install by default useless packages. There is a case which I want to install a package and other package will control their process lifecycle (i.e. p

Re: ARCH sh (SuperHelix)

hi, On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > some time ago, there was a sh (SuperHelix) architecture in > Debian which has disapeared. Now I have a project where I > need this stuff (even not complete) and like to know > > 1) Who went the porters >