Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?

2003-04-15 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
"Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:54:06 +, Michael Banck wrote: >> I did a couple of NMUs for RC bugs in the last days - I uploaded >> straight to DELAYED/7-day, sent a mail with a diff to the BTS and >> set the bug to +pending. So far, I did not get much c

Re: debian-installer status 2002-11-22

2002-11-22 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > EVMS support has been added.. I played with it a little, but it was > broken because it was compiled with readline support, while no > readline libraries were in the archive. I've just played around with > it a bit more, and it looks like it needs some

Re: foomatic unmaintained?

2002-09-04 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The HP syupported hpijs driver brings much better quality for color > printing than pcl3,... The foomatic package in Debian (all version > use the same!) does not yet have and hpijs entry for OJ6xx. I guess I still cannot understand what you mean. $ gre

Re: foomatic unmaintained?

2002-09-03 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > some weeks ago I was installing an HP OfficeJet and on the hpoj > mailing list somebody was pointing out that I need the latest > version of foomatic to get good results.but it seems that the > Debian foomatic-{bin,db} packages in sid are o

Re: Preview of new Ghostscript packages - please test

2001-09-21 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please take a look at these packages and tell me about any problems > which are not obvious - there is a lot of stuff still lacking and I > only want to upload the packages to the archive when they are > feature complete. I really do not know much ab