Re: Proposal: plocate as standard for bookworm

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:29 PM Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Now, there is plocate (written and maintained by myself). It is orders of > magnitude faster than mlocate I use plocate on most days. Directly installed on laptops and desktops, and via backports on all my file servers. > I believe a

Re: RFC: DEP-14: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Tobias Frost wrote: >> One point came to my mind: NMUs >> Can we maybe add some words what would be best practice to handle NMUs? > > I think the current best practices are fine: the NMUer should send a > debdiff to th

Re: RFC: DEP-14: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Whatever the decision will be on debian/master, I think that master > should be at the very least an option. I.e. a debian-only repo? That's what pabs also seems to prefer so it probably makes sense to support/allow both. FWIW, I strongly di

Re: RFC: DEP-14: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Please allow debian/master as an alternative. It fits with the general git > usage of "master", it fits with the workflow of several packages, where you > do experimental->unstable, and it is not going to surprise anyone that

Re: so long and thanks for all the fish

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I > originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish > everyone well, but I'm out. see shy jo :( Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list

Re: Reminder: Removing < 2048 bit keys from the Debian keyrings

Can you put this list, and a count, in a place I can wget from? Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gSx377A0rG6ZYhszEfm27u0q5KW7bDtG9gi9a

Re: First steps towards source-only uploads

Thanks a lot; this is great news! Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.

Re: Valve games for Debian Developers

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Zlatan Todoric wrote: > Can now be a reason for becoming a DD - I want to get free Valve games? :) The absolute monetary value of the Valve Pack on Steam is €89.99 in Europe; I expect other regions to be about the same. While that can be more or less relative mo

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

Off list. Thanks! Richard

DFSG claims BSD, not BSD 2/3-clause, is DFSG-free

Dear all, during my ongoing NM process, I have been asked to review several Debian documents and propose any changes I would like to see. While, to put it bluntly, I think the Debian Constitution is written somewhat sloppily, it's most likely not worth going through a GR to get what amounts to ja

Bug#714226: ITP: metamonger -- metamonger - Store, restore, and diff metadata

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Richard Hartmann * Package name: metamonger Version : 0.20130627 Upstream Author : Richard Hartmann * URL : https://github.com/RichiH/metamonger * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Perl Description : metamonger

Bug#660576: ITP: disktest -- verify disk integrity

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Richard Hartmann * Package name: disktest Version : 0.20120220 Upstream Author : Richard Hartmann * URL : https://github.com/RichiH/disktest * License : GPL Programming Lang: POSIX Shell Description : verify

Bug#653364: ITP: vcsh -- manage config files in $HOME via fake bare git repositories

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Richard Hartmann * Package name: vcsh Version : 0.20111226 Upstream Author : Richard Hartmann * URL : https://github.com/RichiH/vcsh * License : GPL Programming Lang: POSIX Shell Description : manage config

Re: Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

On Feb 7, 2008 8:52 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for being naive but why these ones ? Who is Bastian Kleineidam He is a DD, so I chose his packages over wxwidget's on the assumption that he is more familiar with packaging. Feel free to try the other one and decide if obe sui

Re: Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

On Feb 4, 2008 6:24 PM, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard, please don't profess to speak for me -- especially not couched > in terms such as "more or less". There were several things that people > tried to explain to you in that discussion that you 'more or less' > refused to accept, so p

Re: Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

gards, Richard Hartmann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

On Feb 3, 2008 4:13 AM, Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see an "other option" and it is straightforward. Do like what was > done in lenny with wxwidget2.4 and my package ctsim which requires > wxwidgets 2.4. They were removed from Debian testing and it's not a > problem. Simply down

Proposition: 'NMU' upload of wxwidgets 2.8

other option. Best regards, Richard Hartmann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]