Hello,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:35:24AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 07.16, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Then I found trei...@debian.org using edos-file-overwrite. That latter
> > one seems like what I need here. Should we move it to the qa space and
> > drop the edos part? I sugge
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:24:25PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > What I mean when looking at the armhf log[1] this starts with>
> > > autopkgtest [21:45:36]: host ci-worker-armhf-01; command line:
> > > /usr/bin/autop
Hello,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 06:57:31AM +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Unless I deeply misunderstand how locales work in Debian,
> I believe that any dependency on the ‘locales’ package is ought
> to be satisfied with locales-all as well.
>
> Could the maintainers of the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: coq-menhirlib
Version : 20200123-1
Upstream Author : Jacques-Henri Jourdan
* URL : http://gallium.inria.fr/~fpottier/menhir/
* License : LGPL3+
Programming Lang: Coq
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: ocaml-fpath
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Bünzli
* URL : https://erratique.ch/software/fpath
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: caml-mode
Version : recent (*)
Upstream Author : Damien Doligez, Jacques Garrigue, Xavier Leroy, Didier
Remy, Ian T Zimmerman
* URL : https://github.com/ocaml/caml-mode
* License : GPL2
In this particular case the above stanza
should probably be replaced by
mkdir -p /var/lib/sgml-base
which does the right thing silently when it is possible, and fails with
a message otherwise.
Any thoughts? -Ralf.
--
Ralf Treinen
Institut de Recherche en Informatique Fondamentale
Équipe Preuves, Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: ocaml-cairo2
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Christophe Troestler
* URL : https://github.com/Chris00/ocaml-cairo
* License : LGPL3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: morsmall
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Yann Régis-Gianas, Nicolas Jeannerod, Ralf Treinen
* URL : https://github.com/colis-anr/morsmall
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: lablgtk3
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Jacques Garrigue
* URL : http://lablgtk.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings for
pts!
> AFAIK, Niels Thykier has done a lot of work there, while Ralf
> Treinen and colleagues are analysing maintainer scripts - they
> even wrote a shell script parser, that is not a shell itself.
Indeed, our goal is to do QA on maintainer script and to detect
(possibly) buggy ones,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: morbig
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Yann Régis-Gianas, Nicolas Jeannerod, Ralf Treinen
* URL : https://github.com/colis-anr/morbig
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:48:22PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > You are absolutely right that our assumption about the authors intention
> > may be wrong, and that they really intended the redirection the way th
Hello Wouter,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 01:15:57PM +0800, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as announced in our talk at debconf'18 [1] we intend a MBF about wrong
> > redirections in maintainer
Hi,
as announced in our talk at debconf'18 [1] we intend a MBF about wrong
redirections in maintainer scripts. In general these are of the form
foo 2>&1 1> /dev/null
Here it was probably intended to send both stderr and stdout to /dev/null.
In reality the effect of this is to send only 1 to /d
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:50:39PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Proposal:
> If one (me) can't determine the likely principle package that needs
> fixing after some effort [1], one bug (per upload of the triggering
> package) can be filed against the trigging package with the other
> packa
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 04:15:18AM +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> [2018-03-01 22:54] Ralf Treinen
> > should we really allow for the usage of alias in maintainer scripts?
> >
> > Policy 10.4 says that /bin/sh scripts may assume an interpreter
> > that imple
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:55:10PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > should we really allow for the usage of alias in maintainer scripts?
>
> As an aside, do you have any concrete examples of maintainer scripts
> that do this? A quick look on codesearch.debian.net does not find any
> for m
Hi,
should we really allow for the usage of alias in maintainer scripts?
Policy 10.4 says that /bin/sh scripts may assume an interpreter
that implements the POSIX standard, plus some additional features
listed in the policy. And the POSIX standards describes alias
substitution in shell scripts [
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: ppx-derivers
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jérémie Dimino
* URL : https://github.com/diml/ppx_derivers
* License : BSD3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : interoperability of
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:23:56PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> we currently have in sid 84 maintainer scripts not using strict mode.
> That is, they neither start on "#!/bin/[ba]sh -e", nor do a "set -e".
Thanks to everybody for your feedback. I guess I will
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:21:01PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > we currently have in sid 84 maintainer scripts not using strict mode.
> > That is, they neither start on "#!/bin/[ba]sh -e", nor do a "set -e
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:01:56AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Christoph Biedl (2017-06-27 00:37:33)
> > Let's be honest: Shell scripts, while easy to write, carry too many risks of
> > unsafe programming. So while your proposed fixing is a step in the right
> > direction, thi
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:09:26PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:23:56PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > we currently have in sid 84 maintainer scripts not using strict mode.
> > That is, they neither start on "#!/bin/[ba]sh -e", nor do a
Hi,
we currently have in sid 84 maintainer scripts not using strict mode.
That is, they neither start on "#!/bin/[ba]sh -e", nor do a "set -e".
The list is attached. This list includes the 12 remaining scripts not
starting on #! (bugs are already filed for these).
Policy says in Section 10.4:
S
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: ppx-deriving-yojson
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : whitequark
* URL : https://github.com/whitequark/ppx_deriving_yojson
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:28:12AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > * Package name: visitors
> > Version : 20170404
>
> FYI, there was already a visitors source package in Debian (RMed after
> jessie)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: visitors
Version : 20170404
Upstream Author : François Pottier
* URL : https://gitlab.inria.fr/fpottier/visitors
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml
Hi, I was under the impression that during the soft freeze (i.e, now) new
usptream versions of packages that are already in testing are blocked
from migrating. However, I can't find anything to this effect in the
announcements by the release team. Can please someone in the know
confirm, or correct
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: ocplib-simplex
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Mohamed Iguernlala
* URL : https://github.com/OCamlPro-Iguernlala/ocplib-simplex
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:57:18PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:49 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > two days ago, syslog-ng 3.8.1-5 migrated to testing. However, as this
> > package build-depends on libssl1.0-dev which is available in unstable
> > only a
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:51:50AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borows
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > * wanna-build(?)'s resolution of arch-specific build-depends is buggy.
> > > For
> > > example, my
Hi all,
thanks to everybody for your advise.
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 01:02:27AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:22:02PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > in the Colis project (which aims at analyzing maintainer scripts) we
> > found 39
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:01:31PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:22:02PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> > in the Colis project (which aims at analyzing maintainer scripts) we
> > found 39 maintainer scripts in stable
Hi,
in the Colis project (which aims at analyzing maintainer scripts) we
found 39 maintainer scripts in stable which do not start on #!. The
list is attached. Policy 6.1 says about maintainer scripts:
if they are scripts (which is recommended), they must start with the
usual #! convention.
A
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:28:18PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 08.09.2016 14:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Emmanuel Bourg writes ("Re: Network access during build"):
> >> That makes sense, but in this case what is the usefulness of the
> >> Standards-Version field? And more precisely, why is it
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 06:58:37PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Geert Stappers
>
> > FWIW I agree with both '"main package "should have documentation'
> > and 'additional documentation in separate doc package'.
>
> I think we should stop recommending documentation be put in a separate
> pa
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 02:41:42PM +, peter green wrote:
> 5: in the dose case seperating out arch specific packages (which are not
> allowed to be uninstallable) from arch all packages (which are allowed to be
> uninstallable), it is indicated in the list with an [all] tag but spotting
> the
Hi, seen this morning:
$ grep -c '^Package: ' XXX_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
50007
-Ralf
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:25:40PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> the following packages contain lines matching the
> expression:
> /var/lib/apt/lists/.*(Packages|Sources)
>
> Those files may be compressed by any compressor
> supported by APT and just hardcoding them is
> wrong.
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 05:18:10PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> Ah okay! Somehow I misunderstood your initial email that you wanted to say:
>
> Depends: foo:i386, foo:amd64, ..., bar:i386, bar:amd64,...
>
> But instead you just want...
>
> Depends: foo:i386, foo:amd64, ...
>
Hi Josch,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:41:24AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Ralf Treinen (2014-11-07 17:35:06)
> > It just appeared to me that we probably do not have a syntax to pinpoint a
> > package built for a specific architecture. "We" mea
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:39:41PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Freitag, 7. November 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > The issue of architecture=all packages that
> > are not installable on some architecture can IMHO not be solved with
> > our current setu
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 06:11:45PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 07/11/14 16:15, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > There is only one package in the "each" category, and this is a false
> > positive due to multiarch: lib32nss-mdns, which exists only on amd64
> > (this
Hi Holger,
(repliying separately to the two pointes raised by you)
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:46:31PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > yes, you did miss something :-)
> > first link on the page: "Non-installable
that I can currently think of is
native-arch: amd64
foreign-archs: i386
Are there are any other useful combinations ? Maybe in the arm world?
-Ralf.
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~treine
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (also, btw, I couldn't find the daily DOSE runs linked from
> tttps://qa.debian.org/dose - did I miss it or is it missing?)
yes, you did miss something :-)
first link on the page: "Non-installable packages"
then you choose
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 12:51:53PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Paul Wise , 2014-09-07, 17:38:
> >>We should probably also monitor package conflicts. We made a big fuss
> >>about node vs nodejs (and rightly so); but I bet that we have lots of
> >>other package pairs in the archive that can'
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:01:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Il Sabato 5 Luglio 2014 13:03, Charles Plessy ha
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > > The ‘amap-align’ package version 2.2-4 install the file ‘amap’ in
> > > ‘/usr/bin’,
> > > this is why I am worried about clashes.
>
> Le Sat, Jul 05
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:40:30PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
> > > we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
>
> great ne
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:06:10AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-05-23, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > yes. I didn't keep this in the new version since I felt that these weather
> > icons are more of a gimmick than really useful. The important information
> > is in th
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > If you have other ideas of what could be useful to add
>
> The Debian Weather seems to be missing from the new site, old one:
>
> http://edos.deb
Hi Joachim,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:36:27PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> It’s hard to say what is missing, but I find the web page not very
> practical for daily use – compared to, say,
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/. In particular, I’d need a compact
> view that shows that status of
Hello,
the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
at [1]. What is new:
- it now uses the dose-debcheck tool from the dose suite, which is
multiarch-aware
- it has much improved explanations of no
Hello,
when working on the next version of dose-distcheck we found a cornercase
where we are not sure about multiarch semantics. To explain the problem
at hand of an example: without mutiarch, we all know that a self-conflict
is ignored:
Package: a1
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1
Conflicts: virta
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:11:57PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Since texmacs 1.0.7.13, texmacs includes all fonts
> of texmacs-extra-fonts so texmacs-common sets
When that happend, texmacs-extra-fonts should probably have been replaced
by an empty transitional package that depends on texmacs.
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:11:57PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Since texmacs 1.0.7.13, texmacs includes all fonts
> of texmacs-extra-fonts so texmacs-common sets
> Conflicts: texmacs-extra-fonts since Sep. 2011 and
> it seems there is no problem by now.
> So I think texmacs-extra-fonts is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: garmin-plugin
Version : 0.3.12-1
Upstream Author : Andreas Diesner
* URL : http://www.andreas-diesner.de/garminplugin/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : browser
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
>
> * Package name: ben
> Version : 0.6
> Upstream Author : Mehdi Dogguy and Stéphane Glondu
> * URL : http://ben.debian.net/
> * License :
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:59:00PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Harald Dunkel
>
> > How can I tell a Debian package to conflict with a real
> > package "foo", but not with other packages providing "foo"?
>
> Conflicts: foo (>= 0)
>
> since versioned provides don't exist.
Conflicts: foo (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: coinst
Version : 1.01-1
Upstream Author : Jérôme Vouillon
* URL : http://coinst.irill.org
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : computes the co-installability
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:33:43PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Depends: fuse [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any]
> [..]
> I'm also not sure whether it is better to use '|' or just ',' here.
> Probably it doesn't matter.
I haven't looked into the apt code but from a logical point of view
both
Hi,
is it an RC bug when a package in unstable depends on packages in
eperimental (that is, can only be installed in unstable+experimental
but not in unstable alone)? I always thought so, but when looking into
policy I only found mention of dependencies crossing the bounderies of
archive areas, wh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: packup
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Mikoláš Janota, Joao Marques-Silva, Inês Lynce, and Vasco
Manquinho
* URL : http://sat.inesc-id.pt/~mikolas/sw/packup/
* License : GPL3+
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: minisat+
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Niklas Eén and Niklas Sörensson
* URL : http://minisat.se/MiniSat+.html
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C++
Description : solver for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: mccs
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Claude Michel
* URL : http://users.polytech.unice.fr/~cpjm/misc/mccs.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : multi-critera CUDF
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: aspcud
Version : 2011.03.17
Upstream Author : Roland Kaminski
* URL : http://www.cs.uni-potsdam.de/wv/aspcud/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : a CUDF solver
ates and stable
proposed updates (http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/stable.php,
scroll down the page).
> 2) No packages with (detectable) conflicts are shipped as part of a
>release. This is not daily monitored, but periodically checked with
>an initiative by Ralf Treinen describe
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:30:03PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Jakub Wilk
> | Shouldn't dak reject debs with duplicate filenames in the first place?
>
> No, packages might very well ship duplicate files (think all mtas
> shipping /usr/sbin/sendmail) but they then have to conflict + replac
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:43:23AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought
> that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
> Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
> Debian, due to
RC bug. Still, cases like this deserve
investigation why we have two versions in the archive for such a long time.
-Ralf
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:46:42PM -0400, Daniel E. Markle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:50:55AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > I started to file bugs against packages that are not installable on any
>
> I am working on xtrkcad (on your list) at Debconf now. It al
yet:
http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php
Any opinions? -Ralf
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
Package name:dose3
Version: 0.7
Upstream Author: Pietro Abate
URL: http://gforge.info.ucl.ac.be/frs/download.php/160/dose3-0.7.tar.gz
Licence: GPL >=3
Programming Language: OCaml
Tentative Description:
Dose3 is a framework m
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 10.01.2010, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Xavier Roche:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > How to deal with a desktop-command-not-in-package lintian warning when a
> > .desktop file in a "common" package B references a binary in package A
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:22:09AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > GPG keysigning coordination is since a long time done by a small
> > group of people independendent from FrontDesk. Currently this is
> > basically me, with an offer from Patrick S
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:26:55PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> GPG keysigning coordination
> ---
>
> FD/DAM would like to to move the GPG keysiging coordination over to
> someone else. It's not really part of FrontDesk work; and as we are
> rewriting the webpage anyhow w
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:44:41PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Do you know any tools or teams using tools that, like lintian,
> automatically check packages (or whatever it is that the team is
> working on) and thereby helps to maintain a common baseline?
Emdebian is using edos-debcheck to ve
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:27:47AM -0600, w...@debian.org wrote:
> The following packages have been orphaned:
>yaclc (#519377), orphaned yesterday
> Description: Check the bug closings in a Debian changelog
> Installations reported by Popcon: 32
maybe it can be integrated into devs
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:51:42PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> I'm quiet interested in helping out a bit, but for now undecided.
>
> > Ralf Treinen and I have been taking care of this page the last years but
> > I want to focus on other tasks so we'r
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:51:19PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> The version numbers go like
>
> 4.1
> 4.12
> 4.2rc -> 4.2~rc
> 4.2
> 4.21
> (maybe 4.3)
>
> So, 4.12 and 4.21 are point releases, and break the ordering.
>
> I would now like to package 4.21, but I'm aware that this leads the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared
> > file
> > names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that
> >
Hi,
The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time
since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package:
http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/
In these package pairs, (at least) one of the two packages must declare
a conflict with the other pack
Sorry if this has been answered before, but looking at section 2.3.3 of
the doc-base manual (version 0.8.10) I cannot find a section TeX. If
memory serves me right we used to have a section "tex", at least I
used to register the docs of some my TeX-related packages there :-)
Has this section been r
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:16:39PM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2008, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > I don't know if there's any previous work on this, but since I as a
> > sid user often see conflicts in packages, and I've seen those on
> > numerous oldstable->stable upgrade
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:29:41PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Ralf Treinen wrote:
>> I do not think that automatically forwarding bugs would be a good idea.
> Right now it is a pain to forward a bug, say to a sourceforge bug
> report, because it involves several steps:
[...]
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:38:19AM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Dear -devel:
>
> Following the trend to add metadata to the debian/control file that
> allows for the creation of new and powerful tools, I thought about the
> usefulness of a header that'd allow to automatically relate to
> upstrea
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:01:51AM +0600, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Currently, the `fortunes' package depends on either
> `fortune-mod' or `fortune-min':
>
> $ apt-cache show fortunes
> Package: fortunes
> ...
> Source: fortune-mod
> Version: 1:1.99.1-3
> Provides: fortune-cookie-db
> Depe
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:07:14AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On lun, 2008-01-07 at 20:06 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Some weeks ago I noticed that some package descriptions incorrectly
> > spell
> > some project names, mainly because of capitalisation.
> > For example GNOME is being
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: yap
Version : 5.1.1
Upstream Author : Luis Damas and Vitor Santos Costa, plus contributors
* URL : http://www.ncc.up.pt/~vsc/Yap/
* License : Artistic
Programming L
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:00:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:30:43AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz a écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > * Package name: sturmbahnfahrer
>
> Dear Miriam,
>
> I have very bad feelings when I read the name of this game. It is a very
> bad taste pla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocamlmakefile
Version : 6.24.8
Upstream Author : Markus Mottl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ocaml.info/home/ocaml_sources.html#toc16
* License : LGPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cmigrep
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Eric Stokes
* URL : http://homepage.mac.com/letaris/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : search in
Hello,
I am happy to announce the availability of daily runs of
edos-debcheck. The results can be accessed here:
http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/
A first version was set up during the QA meeting in Extremadura, but I
came only recently around to implement some missing features. Fabio
Ma
Hi,
a paper on automatic tools to assist in distribution managment will
be presented at the 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on
Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2006) next week in Tokyo [1].
Managing the Complexity of Large Free and Open Source Package-Based
Software Distributions
T
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:57:10AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Thomas Goirand said:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID
> >> and sign my key?
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:38:22AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 21:53, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > The constraint solving algorithm is complete, that is it finds a
> > solution whenever there exists one, even for multiple disjunctive
> > dependen
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:30:48PM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:53:20PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: debcheck
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: debcheck
Version : as of 2006/3/19
Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~vouillon/
* License : GPL
Prog
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
