Re: Single Sign On for Debian

2017-08-22 Thread Philipp Hug
On Aug 22, 2017 8:23 AM, "Luca Filipozzi" wrote: > Has anyone looked at Keycloak? http://www.keycloak.org/ I have and deployed it for others in production. Not an unreasonable option. I'm running it in production as well. If you need some help to evaluate/configure it, just ping me. Philipp

Bug#802463: ITP: rkflashtool -- Tools for flashing Rockchip devices

2015-10-20 Thread Philipp Hug
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philipp Hug * Package name: rkflashtool Version : 0~20150809 Upstream Authors: Ivo van Poorten, Fukaumi Naoki, Guenter Knauf, Ulrich Prinz, Steve Wilson * URL : https://github.com/linux-rockchip/rkflashtool

Bug#304330: ITP: iscsitarget -- iSCSI Enterprise Target

2005-04-12 Thread Philipp Hug
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Philipp Hug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: iscsitarget Version : 0.4.6 Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : iSCSI Enter

Re: MTA in base system installation

2005-02-17 Thread Philipp Hug
> What the hell is a "base installation"? The list of packages that gets installed by d-i/debootstrap... > Install whatever you want. You're free to install nullmailer, ssmtp, > etc. > I know I can replace it with whatever I want, that's not the point. I'm just wondering if it makes sense to have

MTA in base system installation

2005-02-17 Thread Philipp Hug
Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation? Wouldn't it make more sense to just install a simple store-and-forward proxy (e.g nullmailer)? Or are there other alternatives that just provide a sendmail wrapper? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Regarding XEN kernel images

2005-02-16 Thread Philipp Hug
> > 2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful. > > Yes, they are broken. This was a first try without success. > Ok, I'll have a look at them. I thought it was my mistake ;-) > It seams that you are running a SCSI RAID. Did you compiled all drivers > staticly? Which .config did you used? I'v

Re: Regarding XEN kernel images

2005-02-16 Thread Philipp Hug
Raphael, I was able to get Xen running. But you need at least the 2.0.4-4 packages, as the -3 packages were missing the xen.gz code. 2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful. I assume that it shouldn't be used for the Domain-0 as Xen seems to expect the kernels in ELF format... This is

Subversion / swig1.3

2004-10-26 Thread Philipp Hug
subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not in testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would break subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-) did I miss something or is this just a bug in the testing script and needs manual hinting? philipp

Bug#120237: ITP: jboss

2003-10-19 Thread Philipp Hug
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Followup-For: Bug #120237 I intend to package jboss. I'll upload my.debgs to mentors.debian.org because I'm not an official debian developer yet. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux morpheus.int.abacus.ch 2.4.21