On Aug 22, 2017 8:23 AM, "Luca Filipozzi" wrote:
> Has anyone looked at Keycloak? http://www.keycloak.org/
I have and deployed it for others in production. Not an unreasonable
option.
I'm running it in production as well. If you need some help to
evaluate/configure it, just ping me.
Philipp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Hug
* Package name: rkflashtool
Version : 0~20150809
Upstream Authors: Ivo van Poorten, Fukaumi Naoki, Guenter Knauf,
Ulrich Prinz, Steve Wilson
* URL : https://github.com/linux-rockchip/rkflashtool
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Hug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: iscsitarget
Version : 0.4.6
Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : iSCSI Enter
> What the hell is a "base installation"?
The list of packages that gets installed by d-i/debootstrap...
> Install whatever you want. You're free to install nullmailer, ssmtp,
> etc.
>
I know I can replace it with whatever I want, that's not the point.
I'm just wondering if it makes sense to have
Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation?
Wouldn't it make more sense to just install a simple store-and-forward proxy
(e.g nullmailer)?
Or are there other alternatives that just provide a sendmail wrapper?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
> > 2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful.
>
> Yes, they are broken. This was a first try without success.
>
Ok, I'll have a look at them. I thought it was my mistake ;-)
> It seams that you are running a SCSI RAID. Did you compiled all drivers
> staticly? Which .config did you used? I'v
Raphael,
I was able to get Xen running. But you need at least the 2.0.4-4 packages, as
the -3 packages were missing the xen.gz code.
2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful. I assume that it shouldn't be
used for the Domain-0 as Xen seems to expect the kernels in ELF format...
This is
subversion depends on swig >= 1.3.22-2 which is in unstable. but it's not in
testing yet because swig cannot be put into testing because it would break
subversion 1.0.6-2 ;-)
did I miss something or is this just a bug in the testing script and needs
manual hinting?
philipp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #120237
I intend to package jboss. I'll upload my.debgs to mentors.debian.org
because I'm not an official debian developer yet.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux morpheus.int.abacus.ch 2.4.21
9 matches
Mail list logo