Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Teichman
On 23 Apr 2001 20:58:57 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old libxml1. > i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by simply installing > libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a package from libxml1 to > libxml2 is quite easy,

Re: gtk-doc vs glib1.2-dev info file conflict

2000-12-27 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:19:11PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > I have the helix version installed: > (Also this version should replace libgtk-doc, shouldn't it?) Whenever any helix packages are involved, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the appropriate place to report problems. Not debian-devel. > #dpkg

Re: ITP: SkipStone

2000-09-05 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:03:07AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote: > Skipstone is a GTK+ webbrowser that uses mozilla's embed features. It is > similar to galeon only it is pure GTK+, no GNOME. The author asked me to > make packages of it, and I have uploaded it into Debian. It is placed under > the

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-09-05 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:29:32AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > I believe the infamous "aalib" affair actualy came out of a wishlist > bugreport submitted to them by a user; the then frozen potato aalib was too > low a version to meet all the helix dependencies. This meant people like me > had to

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > 3) Libraries - All possible effort should be made to make Debian the > primary source of libraries. Period full stop. This is so important > because of what we are seeing with helix and their special library > pack

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > >>>> "PT" == Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > PT> This solution looks like the best one. I'll start rebuilding our > PT> packages immediate

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:20:48AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > That is one mechanism of creating a private namespace, isn't another > > > Setting the origin to something other than Debian? > > > > Please see elsewhere in this thread for

Re: (Beware helix packages) Re: [CrackMonkey] The right to bare legs

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:02:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > No, there is no difference between our apps and the upstream in most > > cases. We do brand gnome-core and gdm, but those are the only packages > > I can think of offhand. Those are only graphics changes, substituting > > some of

Re: So whos going to ALS

1999-10-06 Thread Peter Teichman
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 04:55:12PM -0400, Johnie Ingram wrote: > > ... and would be willing to help at the Debian booth (#503, community > pavillion, check it out), or who knows good places to stay at in > Atlanta? Or who wants to planepool with the Novare team from Dallas? I'll be there for the

Re: KDE gone, Lyx next ?

1998-10-10 Thread Peter Teichman
I'd say.. I doubt that the toolkit-independence will be done very soon, and they should be notified anyway.. Peter -- Peter Teichman (Parenthetic Me) [EMAIL PROTECTED]