d. But it also means the package is known to
build (on all architectures) before being copied into testing or
experimental.
--
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/
PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D
fingerprint = AD0A C5DF C426 4F03 5D53 2BDB 18D8 A4E2 D0ED B64
puzzled me that there are not license packages that one
could Depends on, and get the appropriate license placed in the
appropriate place. Apt-get is an excellent mechanism for that kind of
thing, why not use it?
--
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/
PG
or ill-considered GPL
obligations.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1333410919.3415.4.ca...@hawk.miller.emu.id.au
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 16:24 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:02 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> > I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> > an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> >
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:02 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
t?
--
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/
PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D
fingerprint = AD0A C5DF C426 4F03 5D53 2BDB 18D8 A4E2 D0ED B64D
See http://www.keyserver.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
"Get the facts first. You can distort them later.&qu
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Miller writes:
>
> > My understanding is that all project files are covered, although
> > wildcards are permitted.
>
> > Each different copyright x license combination needs its own separate
> > entr
ild the
Debian package for Continuous Integration (even though it's "upstream"
at that point).
I think this information should be highlighted in
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 18:20 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Miller writes:
>
> This objection makes me think that you believe that more information is
> required by the DEP-5 format than is in your existing debian/copyright
> files.
My understanding is that all project fi
ng the optional DEP-5 misery.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1326852576.2413.37.camel@hawk
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 10:41 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> I was also trying to solve the timestamp problem, so that +dfsg / +ds
> repacks could be done reproduceably.
Have you looked at Tardy?
http://tardy.sf.net/
It has numerous filters.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
ns mismatch for the shmid you are using.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1314529860.2648.15.camel@hawk
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:39 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> and where was rudeness?
> should I add flowers and kisses to emails?
^^^
This. This is rudeness.
Lose the sarcasm, if you wish to communicate more effectively.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUB
inguishable from) noise from GUI
applications?
A simple "silence unless asked for debug" aka "the unix golden rule"
official Policy seems like (a) a great idea, (b) simple to explain, and
(c) simple to implement.
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-req
can ssh to, and do the edit-build-test loop more efficiently?
[1] http://libexplain.sourceforge.net/
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libexplain&dist=unstable
--
Peter Miller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
will ever read it,
plus it duplicates information already in the source package.
On the other hand, one line for each contributor means less than a dozen
lines, which makes far more sense IMHO. But, again, it duplicates
information in the AUTHORS file.
--
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http:
ta is in cache is > 9 seconds,
confirming what Martin has been saying... and ~30 times longer than the
fstrcmp overhead.
I will have version 0.1 ready shortly.
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/
PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D
fingerprint = AD0A C5DF
I contribute it to an existing project and which one?
--
Regards
Peter Miller
/\/\*http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/
PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D
fingerprint = AD0A C5DF C426 4F03 5D53 2BDB 18D8 A4E2 D0ED B64D
See http://www.keyserver.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
s
18 matches
Mail list logo
