On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Harald Braumann wrote:
>
> So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> cgroups/, to not allow it there?
Right, that's what I proposed a couple of emails earlier in this thread.
P
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > Having one virtual filesystem mounted on top of another virtual
>> > filesystem seems like a recipe for problems.
>>
>> Like with /sys/fs/fuse/connections ? Come on, there is no
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gustavo Noronha wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>> I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups
>> are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in
>> '/dev/' either.
>>
>> Since they're a file
3 matches
Mail list logo
