Den 29. mai 2010 17:51, skrev Julien Cristau:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 16:09:25 +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Den 23. mai 2010 15:47, skrev Ove Kaaven:
Is it okay if I go ahead and do such a NMU?
Well, since there have been no objections for a week, I guess I'll go ahead.
I had been read
Den 23. mai 2010 15:47, skrev Ove Kaaven:
Is it okay if I go ahead and do such a NMU?
Well, since there have been no objections for a week, I guess I'll go ahead.
I had been ready for some feedback from the mingw32 maintainers like
"we're working on an updated mingw32, just
The lack of a suitable (i.e. non-buggy) mingw32 cross-compiler has
blocked Wine updates for half a year now. Both the mingw32 package (gcc
4.2.1) and the gcc-mingw32 package (gcc 4.4.2) have a bug which was
fixed in upstream gcc 4.4.3. At least one of these should be updated, if
we want a fully
Stefano Zacchiroli skrev:
Since apparently there are quite cases like that, what is the reason for
forbidding arch-specific dependencies in control? Can we reconsider
that?
What is the problem with arch-specific dependencies in control? I've
used them just fine (in wine, see libwine-dev) for a
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Flight Gear is a free and highly sophisticated flight simulator.
Since my time may be limited in the future, I am seeking comaintainers
for the Flight Gear packages in Debian.
I have created a project for this on alioth.debian.org. I've loaded the
current packaging
Andrea Bolognani skrev:
When you have a lot of software installed on your system, it might get
difficult to trace exactly which configuration files you need and which
ones you don't need.
Now imagine the following situation: a package's maintainer can declare the
per-user configuration/cache fil
Joerg Jaspert skrev:
- Packages in main need to be installable and not cause their (indirect)
reverse build-depends to FTBFS in the absence of data.debian.org.
If the data is necessary for the package to work and there is a small
dataset (like 5 to 10 MB) that can be reasonably substitu
Peter Palfrader skrev:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 15 Mai 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
I beg to differ. This particular mail is important enough to be sent to
d-d-a instead of d-i-a.
I agree, dia is not what I would be subscribed to under normal
circumstances, and with all
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Since my time may be limited in the future, I am seeking comaintainers
for the Wine package in Debian, at least to ensure that new Wine releases
may continue to be uploaded in a timely fashion, and to keep the package's
bug count down. (And given that pretty much hal
Andreas Barth skrev:
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080415 22:26]:
I suspect by the time a fully working multiarch is done, x86 won't need
it anymore because everything will be fully 64bit. :)
As Wine maintainer, I'd disagree with that.
People, we want to release soon. Anyone is wel
Mike Hommey skrev:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:36:17PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Bradley Smith skrev:
1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
static libraries as upstream intended?
There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really
have a s
Bradley Smith skrev:
1. Should these shared libraries be built, or should it just stick to
static libraries as upstream intended?
There are advantages and disadvantages with either... I don't really
have a strong opinion myself (as long as the result works). But if I had
to choose, I'd probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wine on amd64 has a problem with bug #430845. If libnss-mdns is
installed, Wine won't work properly without lib32nss-mdns, but works if
neither is installed.
Since I haven't seen any signs of the nss-mdns guys being in a hurry to
fix the problem, I w
PETER EASTHOPE skrev:
I have these 5 bytes of machine code to disassemble.
b8 12 00 cd 10
I've looked at gdb and objdump. Appears they
need a complete object file. What tool can disassemble
this string?
If all else fails, decode it with your head, maybe? I probably would...
You're gi
ons, 15,.11.2006 kl. 18.39 +0100, skrev Paul Seelig:
> This version is already rather ancient according to upstream's release
> schedule. It was released on September 13, 2006, closely followed by
> version 0.9.22 on September 28, 2006 and version 0.9.23 on October 25,
> 2006. The current version 0
15 matches
Mail list logo
