Re: Porting Xconfigurator to Debian!

hi, On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:22:05AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 > > > works quite fine here. > > > > > It does kinda assume you know what you want yo

Re: why was there no bug filed?

hi, On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.04.1353 +0100]: > > I'd be extremely surprised if the explanation wasn't something along the > > lines of "we didn't get round to it" or "something more important came > > u

Re: why was there no bug filed?

hi, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:34:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.04.1319 +0100]: > > It's easier to notice these things in a timely fashion if you put > > 'grep-excuses "your name"' (or just 'grep-excuses' with > > GREP_EXCUSES_MAINTAINER

Re: yacc on arm???

hi, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:11:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > please check > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gradm&ver=1.5a-1 > > bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides > bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives. > > so what's the dea

Re: yacc on arm???

hi, On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:11:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > please check > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gradm&ver=1.5a-1 > > bison is in build-depends, and at least on i386, it provides > bison.yacc, which yacc is linked to via alternatives. > > so what's the dea

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

hi, On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:05:51PM -0500, Matthew C. Tedder wrote: > I'm contemplating switching to Gentoo for the following reasons: > - Compiles source very trouble free from almost any tgz on the web sources in debian's repository also compile fine w/o problems, where is the point? > -

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:59:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Right; if that happens, then those mirrors won't carry those > additional architectures. No harm done. I, as a mirror maintainer, would find it quite annoying having to look what additional archs are out there and what I

Re: Netwinder debussy.debian.org upgraded

hi, On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:36:13PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > -zsh: error in loading shared libraries: -zsh: symbol getrlimit64, version > GLIBC_2.1.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference > Connection to debussy.debian.org closed. fixed, the zsh package needed a

Re: jabber field on db.debian.org?

hi, On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:24:44PM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote: > Today, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -) Or, during a short period (say, 2 months or so?) both fields could > > be there, and icq should really be dropped. > Or, they could both be there (if space permits) with the

Re: alternative man page reader?

Hi, Actually you can make some text output with groff, for instance: groff -man -Tascii pon.1 > pon.txt works for me :). Let's say for the manuals, but works. so long Othmar