RE: Non-debian running DD's (Was: Re: stop abusing debconf alread y)

2003-04-26 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 21:12, Milanuk, Monte wrote: > Gag. Mail might actually be useful if Apple had had the brains to include > simple stuff like *threading* of messages. All the fluff in the world, and > the message sorting of pine. Go figure. When I got my first Mac (eMac > running 10.1.5 w/

Re: Work-needing packages report for Apr 11, 2003

2003-04-23 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
(Sorry for taking so long to get back) On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 08:28, Darren Salt wrote: > Hmm. They're conffiles (not sure why, given that they're all binaries); have > you tried 2.4 with the 2.3 drums files? I believe I tried that, but I can't recall. As it stands now, I just keep the source to

Re: Work-needing packages report for Apr 11, 2003

2003-04-23 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
(Sorry for taking so long to get back) On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 19:18, Cameron Patrick wrote: > Er, the SBLive and its Creative brethren do, don't they? At least, I'm > presuming that's what "sound fonts" are for. Has it been removed in > later versions of the card? If it's there, I can't find it

Re: Work-needing packages report for Apr 11, 2003

2003-04-11 Thread Nathan Paul Simons
On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 13:57, Lars Bahner wrote: > I am not currently using anything on the wnpp-list, but it > seems to me that not all these packages are better off gotten > rid off. > > Does anyone know something about the importance of these > packages? Has/can someone run this against the pop