SuSE, you already have the same menue in both
DEs.
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wiss. Mitarbeiter, IMGB
La loi, dans un grand souci d'égalité, interdit aux riches comme aux
pauvres de coucher sous les ponts, de mendier dans les rues et de voler
du pain.
(ANATOLE FRANCE)
Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 04:12:58AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> | This is not true. Almost all features are being used in current KDE and
> | to some degree by current GNOME. Could you please give examples?
> The Categories= field (to place .d
E and Gnome.
This is not true. Almost all features are being used in current KDE and to
some degree by current GNOME. Could you please give examples?
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wiss. Mitarbeiter, IMGB
La loi, dans un grand souci d'égalité, interdit aux riches comme
Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> Freedesktop standard supporting
>> systems are probably used by 90% of all Debian desktop users.
>
> Unsubstantial, and probably bullshit.
Maybe you are just incapable of finding arguments and
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the
>> debian menu system? Like i18n, icon theming, dynamic construction of a
>> menu hierarchy based on
pretty simple to implement - just more
> text fields.
Hardly. The desktop system in KDE-3.2+ and Gnome-2.4+ is not as static and
uncustomizable the Debian menu system at the moment.
> That way we support the upstream menu entries in
> everything, not just kde and gnome.
--
Moritz Moe
to that are not supporting,
>> adopting, or intending to adopt the .desktop standard?
>
> Have you any evidence that (or any idea whether) fvwm, icewm, wmaker,
> lwm, ...[1] plan to support .desktop?
It is trivial to support desktop in icewm. Check out icewm.py, one of my few
prog
7 matches
Mail list logo
