23.12.2007 pisze Kalle Kivimaa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why was it removed from Debian GNU/Linux in the first place!?
> It's never been in Debian. The source package is in non-free, as the
> license didn't permit binary distribution. See e.g.
> http
16.11.2005 pisze Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Debian is staffed by volunteers who do this because they want to.
> I, for one, appreciate very, very much what they do for me.
Writing/maintaining software is providing a service (even when
it's free). You need to listen to your customers if y
25.07.2005 pisze Miernik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> These can be matched with the 12 DejaVu TTF fonts:
No, they cannot be matched. DejaVu fonts do not provide exactly the
same metrics as the standard PS fonts. Anyways, what's your problem
with these standard Type1 fonts?
Jubal
--
[ Miros/law L Bar
8.07.2005 pisze Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If everything in main can be ported to pure64 there is little need for
> multiarch on amd64.
There's not only main, you know. Sometimes you need to run other
applications and the ability to run these makes the difference between
using the Debi
17.06.2005 pisze Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think you'd best come up with a better line of argument. The "S" in
> DFSG does not stand for "copyright", it stands for "software".
> Software usually contains copyrighted code, and sometimes it also
> contains trademarked names or images
15.06.2005 pisze Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > You're free to make /any/ modifications to firefox, as long as you
> > either rename it to something else or get permission to call it firefox.
> > Doesn't sound non-free to me.
> Please explain to me why it's alright to get special permissio
9.06.2005 pisze Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> | > Again, do not mess with cultures you do not understand.
> | Do you have real examples?
> IRC. An example is the current irssi in Debian which doesn't do
> recoding between different locales. (And that is needed, since IRC
> doesn't hav
6.06.2005 pisze Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You're forgetting that some people like Marco d'Itri believe the best OS
> ever should integrate the latest and fullest set of non-free crap we can
> find, and not that it should include all architectures we can reasonably
> support.
Don't y
31.05.2005 pisze Stephen Birch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Still looks more like a fork than a derivative . or a spoon :-)
``The question is: who cares?''. Or, better: does it really matter,
what name will be used? Are you perchance a free software taxonomist?
Jubal
--
[ Miros/law L Baran, bara
16.03.2005 pisze Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Package name: ttf-antp
> Version : 0.51
> Upstream Author : Bogus?aw Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr Strzelczyk
> * URL : http://www.janusz.nowacki.strefa.pl/poltawski-e.html
> * License : GPL
> De
11.03.2005 pisze Joerg Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Miros/law Baran schrieb am Freitag, 11. März 2005 um 12:55:09 +0100:
> > 11.03.2005 pisze Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > it worked. I really regard this problem as serious because it
> > > proba
11.03.2005 pisze Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> it worked. I really regard this problem as serious because it
> probably leaves people with SATA hardware with an unbootable system
> after kernel-image updates, because the kernel image packages just
> reinsert "root=/dev/hda?" into grub's me
10.01.2005 pisze Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > 'RTFM' means "Go read the documentation, that's what it's for". I
> > personally find it far more rude to go on a mailing list, ask for the
> Do you *really* think that RTFM means "Go read the documentation,
> that's what it's for"?
If one ha
6.12.2004 pisze Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[...]
> Also, to the best my knowledge the kernel doesn't contain any pictures
> of naked people either. I might be mistaken.
It is much, much worse. There is a picture of naked animal there.
Jubal
--
[ Miros/law L Baran, baran-at-knm-org-pl, neg
5.12.2004 pisze William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:28:14PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > might want, and put it on non-us since it is illegal to distribute such
> > things in the USA (and unlike the possibility of offending people's
> > sensibilities,
15.08.2002 pisze Ben Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Can someone explain what is the problem with switching to Type1
> > altogether?
> Portability.
Portability and the quality of the Type1 rasterizer in X, I'd say.
Jubal
--
[ Miros/law L Baran, baran-at-knm-org-pl, neg IQ, cert AI ] [ 0101
27.09.2001 pisze Bill Wohler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If a multi-billion dollar company whose employees have all learned
> British English decide that their documentation should be in
> American English, that's saying something.
That's saying nothing. Debian IS NOT multi-billion dollar compan
3.09.2001 pisze Radovan Garabik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> well, ok, that would work, but the point is that locale is bloated
> and most people use just a few parts of it, parts that could be
> achieved by other ways.
Locales have two big advantages: they exist and they are quite
consistent.
best re
3.09.2001 pisze Radovan Garabik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> but you have to realize one thing: they are not doing it because of
> locale. They are doing it because they want to tell their
> applications to pass 8-bit characters unaffected.
A quite elegant _theory_. Rather untrue. Falsified by me.
Jub
19 matches
Mail list logo
