hi all,
i am about to write an easy to use editor, using slang ... (remember
this ugly emacs/vi discussion)
i started with slang and noticed that there is nearly no documentation
and no good screen/kbd support at all.
so i tried newt. this one seems to bring it everything. but there is no
docume
no, that's not a new boygroup, it's a copyright problem. for special
decodings xanim uses non-free software. i found the needed .o files
for alpha. perhaps now is the moment to get xanim multi-platform
ready. there is a server with a lot of objects including the missing
for debian.
the question now
> > if you all do not stop this discussion i start writing an editor.
> > easy to use just as EDIT.EXE. for anybody, especially a beginner.
> > also for professionals.
> > :wq
> Go ahead, it wouldn't hurt, would it? :-)
OK, i would start if everybody promisses to stop the discussion if or
if not a
if you all do not stop this discussion i start writing an editor. easy
to use just as EDIT.EXE. for anybody, especially a beginner. also for
professionals.
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So, if you have them ready, please release 4.05 debs. I'm eager to test
> them. :-)
mee too, i would like to see it on alpha...
--
see header
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oops. I forgot to remove that evil archive from the source!
> Technically, we are not allowed to distrbute those. The xanim
> author got a permission to distribute them, but it's
> non-transferable. I tried to contact the company that owns the
> copyright, but got no response, and xanim author
hi,
i copied a harddisk with tar (kind of tar -c -f - | tar -x -f - -C
/copy...) and lost a lot of accessinformation. it seems, that the
umask dropped all the rights for writing for group and other. shure i
didn't read the manual and thi sbehavier may be a feature, not a bug.
but now i've got a de
hi,
i tried to get an alpha-binary of xanim. because i didn't find it on
the mirror i got the source and tried to compile. everything worked
fine but a wrong path in rules (that one for the dotofiles.tgz, no ../
necesary). but then the linker complained about wrong binary: the
source package comes
> > Absolute novices unwilling to learn should be lead gently to
> > the nearest windows box.
> How about something like:
[..]
> This editor has two modes, in Input mode you may enter text,
> in Command mode you may alter previously entered text.
>
> To enter input mode from command mode, hi
> If vi would fit on the rescue disk, do you think we would be discussing
> ae?
i think it's not a good idea to put vi there. this editor can be used
by a profi only and a prof can use any other editor too. a beginner
won't be able to use vi but the easy to use small editor. maybe ae is
bad, but it
> > path without saying what that set path should be. So, why do the
> > vi users like _using_ vi? (Someone already said "it's standard"...
> > can I get real reasons now? :)
i'm faster with vi. that's all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
> > > Alright, the more I think about this, the more I think that James
> > > is probably right. (NO flames, people can change there minds can't
> > > they?) Mc doesn't belong in the base set.
> > i agree to this. neither does vi or emacs belong there, even if emacs
> > whould be an 30KB size
> > > who maintains the mkdosfs package
> > There's no separate mkdosfs package anymore; it has been merged into
> > 'dosfstools' which is maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
> And which I'm fairly certain I ported, since I used it to create the boot
> partition on my alpha...
>
same to me. but why
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Anselm Lingnau wrote:
> > unz512x3.exe is a self-unarching zip, and can be unpacked with Linux unzip
> >
> > gzip124.exe is a self-unarching lharc file and can be unpacked with
> > Linux lha
>
> It might be a good idea to add a note in the README to that
> b) are there tools for m68k or alpha ?
linload, milo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
who maintains the mkdosfs package & why is there no alpha port? infact
i tried to port it but it coredumps. i narrowed down the bug to a
funny part of the code too long to explain here. so i would like to
help here.
--
see header
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
hi all,
why is mutt compiled without pgp-support as default?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
i made my deb-package yesterday for i386 & alpha but now: what have i
to do to release it?
--
see header
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I would like to have `mc' and the two packages it depends on placed
> > into the base set.
> I think this is a horrendously bad idea.
agreed
--
see header
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> but the second error seems to be more serious. in line 1 of my
> changelogfile is nothing wrong compared to the script. it just says:
> z (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> (my package is called 'z' for now) is the name a problem (too short)?
renamed it to zet: that works. so debian package na
hi,
today i tried to build my first debian package but run immidiatly in
an error. i did (nearly ;-) everything as told by the script 'making a
debian package' but after the command build i got the messages:
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("mdt") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controll
21 matches
Mail list logo
