Bug#1034375: ITP: trurl -- command line tool for URL parsing and manipulation

2023-04-13 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Ablassmeier X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: trurl Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Daniel Stenberg, * URL : https://github.com/curl/trurl/ * License : curl Programming Lang: C

zabbix: searching for co-maintainers

2009-09-09 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi guys, As me and Fabio (kobold) are quite busy with real life Tasks we are searching for co-maintainers for debian's zabbix[3] packages. As it stands the Packages are not in bad shape but we want to react before things go wild :-) Personally i started with the maintenance as my old workplace

Re: Automatic retrieval of information from qa.debian.org

2007-10-04 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi David, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > You're looking at libapache-mod-php5, while alioth is currently running PHP4 > (and libapache-mod-php4 hasn't soap builtin). > > Please, take a look at http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/info.php . You'll > notice this: you could probably us

Re: What is the reason glibc is at version 2.3 for etch?

2007-04-04 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi Lex, Lex Hider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi, > I've been discussing with some #fluendo people about their codecs not being > compatible with etch (requires glibc 2.4+). > > Can anyone give a brief answer to why etch will be shipping the glibc at 2.3. > I couldn't provide an explanation as

Re: More orphaned Perl packages to be removed from the archive

2006-12-28 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi Gunnar, On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:11:54PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > I just filed bug #404896 - I'm copying it here as I hope you have some > comments regarding it: > > The following Perl modules have been orphaned (or have not been > updated) for a long time, have no reverse depend

Re: [Dbconfig-common-devel] mass bugfiling: dbconfig-common-using packages violating policy 7.2

2006-08-19 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi sean, On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:54:06AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > unfortunately, the example packages used as guidelines didn't > make any checks to safeguard this, so i suspect most/all of > the packages using dbconfig-common do not either. si

Re: libvorbis and vorbis-tools

2005-11-19 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi, On 2005-11-13, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is Christopher L Cheeney submerged? There are new upstreamversions > of libvorbis and vorbis-tools available which fix a lot. Adeodato Simó is looking into this (#339846). bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: Bug#323227: new list: debian-planet to distribute planet.debian.org postings; archive to enable searching

2005-08-15 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:14:23PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Rob Bradford in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog postings > > > from planet.debian.org. > > > > Please don't introduce any more namespace confusion. > > Agreed. What about

Re: remove ruby1.6

2005-08-14 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:35:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I don't know about aswiki, rsjog, tdiary (tdiary-plugin) > > and tictactoe. (I use tDiary on ruby1.8 and I have no problem.) tictactoe (0.8.1-2) has been uploaded yesterday and

Re: Example where testing-security was used?

2005-05-30 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On 2005-05-21, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone point me to an example where testing-security has actually > been used? http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2005/msg00111.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-

Re: dpatch and patching debian/rules

2005-03-31 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi again, On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to, 2005-03-31 kello 20:45 +, Michael Ablassmeier kirjoitti: >> On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Any package that uses it is going to have to build-depend on the &

Re: dpatch and patching debian/rules

2005-03-31 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi, On 2005-03-31, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any package that uses it is going to have to build-depend on the > lsb-release package, which has no dependencies (it is a bash shell > script and bash is required, so no explicit dependency needed) and is 88 > kilobytes installed. Not

Re: Source of LPhoto

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi Andreas, On 2005-03-17, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But there is no link or other sign of a downloadable source. > > Am I to stupid to find the source or do the people at this site have a > different opinion about downloadable source than I. I wanted to issue an > ITP if it is w

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On 2005-03-15, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> How could we know ? We know nothing about Ubuntu, nothing about >>> Canonical, nothing about the goals, nothing about how everything was >>> done to begin with, nothing about who works or doe

Re: How to build libapache-mod

2005-01-12 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On 2005-01-12, Milan P. Stanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry if this question answered already or the location of doc's > (policy) is easy to find. apache-dev includes `/usr/share/doc/apache-dev/README.modules' which contains a set of simple guidelines on how to integrate external Apache modu

Re: debsums for maintainer scripts (was: Re: Revival of the signed debs discussion)

2003-12-01 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:56:09PM -0500, christophe barbe wrote: > Before mass bug-filling, it would be necessary to make it mandatory > which unfortunately is not the case right now afaik. No, it is not mandatory. However, it would be a nice Wishli

Re: debsums for maintainer scripts (was: Re: Revival of the signed debs discussion)

2003-12-01 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Eduard, On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:08:28PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > - current md5sums file in control.tar.gz should contain >checksums of really all files Unfortunately many Maintainers do not use "dh_md5sums" to ship an .md5sums File in

Re: Grsec/PaX and Exec-shield

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:56:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now surely, Russell, a "security expert" such as yourself is capable of > copy+pasting that last reject in the file. Doing this took one minute. > I would imagine this was much less time than it took for you to write > your i

Re: Grsec/PaX and Exec-shield

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote: > > Why not volunteer to make the .deb, get a sponsor and get it uploaded > > then? > > Good idea! Already did that in fact. So who do I send this new kernel-source > .deb to? You can use the mentors service to exchange your packages w

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-09-22 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi, On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:13:51PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Speaking as a user, too, I want something I can compile a kernel from. > I'm no kernel hacker and do not intend to become one. Thus I see > absolutely no reason, why I should want a debian-package with a > unmodified source-tr

Re: Porting Xconfigurator to Debian!

2002-12-05 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
one of the greatest advantage Debian has. (And one of the greatest advantages LINUX has, but this other Distributions Destroy them cause of X only Setups.) If i have to decide between nice graphical installer, and a nice Dialog Setup, i will prefer the Dialg Setup ! -- greetings /*/ michael ablassmeier