On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:00:01PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> WEP works with network manager but how did you manage WPA via wpa_supplicant
> with the GUI setup tools? It only offered WEP when I looked at it.
I have to choose ``Connect to Other Wireless Network...'' (or whatever
the option in
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Additionally, Ubuntu is not more usable for wireless networks than Debian:
> the
> network configuration only support the useless WEP, no WPA.
I recently bought a System76 laptop with Ubuntu 6.06 pre-installed,
and Network Manage
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:48:24PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> So are some widespread programming languages. If you blindly follow bad
> examples and bad styles you can dynamite yourself happily without even
> noticing, but that does not make them disused or abandoned (on the contrary
> some
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:50:44AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> * The "system mta" should provide /usr/sbin/sendmail, as well as
> mailq, runq, and man pages. The alternative system is able to link
> several alternatives.
Right, so three should be no problems there?
> * The "servic
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:21:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> We don't allow multiple mtas because a mail-transport-agent is *required* to
> provide /usr/sbin/sendmail.
Why can Debian's alternatives system not alleviate this conflict?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:26:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
How about ``pgrep '(g(cc|\+\+)|c(c|\+\+))' | xargs renice 15''?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:27:45PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> My point was that having to tell mutt manually about every mailing list
> is a pain, and people don't do it.
I do.
> The List- headers are sufficient, in my experience, to automate this.
They don't support following up to cross-po
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:03:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Note it is unclear whether the makefiles could be called "scripts"
>
> Unproven assertion.
How is something proven unclear?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> bincmp allows to quickly compare two binary files printing the offset and
> the bytes where the files differ. It should run on just about anything and
> it might even support large files (> 4GB) if your system does LFS properly.
Doe
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:01:57PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
Does this package not have an actual web site?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:39:00AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> In fact, broken servers which don't obey MX will _already_ fail:
>
> [ demonstration that debian.org doesn't accept RCPT TO @debian.org ]
The issue isn't whether MTA's check against MX or A records, it's
whether they check the IP th
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:39:19AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 10 juillet 2006 02:17, Matthew R. Dempsky a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Another problem is with hosts that do not accept a message from an
> &g
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Another problem is with hosts that do not accept a message from an MTA
> unless that MTA is willing to accept replies. This is a common spam
> prevention measure.
It also prevents mail from setups that use different servers fo
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
> +print "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Subscribe to this bug.
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
email to $email.'' to make more explicit that they
don'
(Is debian-devel the correct list for this?)
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> If not, then we should probably try it
Can it be limited to suspected spam (e.g. mail with a high smtp-time
spamassassin score)? Others may disagree, but I prefer the small
amount of
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:44:54AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.02.0238 +0200]:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Submit a feature request to LSB?
>
> And wait 15 years?
Eh, that's only
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Any suggestions?
Submit a feature request to LSB?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Sure we could just have disclosed the license to -legal beforehand,
> but then Sun probably would never talk to us about doing things like
> this one again and just tend to OpenSUSE or some other community
> distributino next time
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:27:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> 1. Make /bin/sh point to /bin/dash
The biggest problem with this seems to be scripts that expect /bin/sh to
point to /bin/bash. Arguably those scripts are broken, but there exists
another choice that avoids that unnecessary
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:47:31AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On an otherwise idle box even a process (re-)niced to 19 uses all the
> CPU. That might be desirable often but in other cases (e.g. when
> CPU temperature is an issue) you might still want to say "assign this
> process only xy% of C
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:35:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral?
> >
> > Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has create
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:01:24AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> On a related note, I'm also working on getting debian-installer going
> on a number of MIPS based consumer devices, such as the Netgear
> WGT634U wireless router. However, this work has not reached the
> maturity of NSLU2 support
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Matthew R. Dempsky, le Sun 12 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0600, a écrit :
> > gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
>
> Or better, -fno-hosted and -fhosted...
What makes those options better in
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:21:40AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
> > function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
>
> No, it is not. At least not with a
24 matches
Mail list logo
