* Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 02:42]:
> I believe the wanna-build admins don't want builds that have neither
> been suitably tested (such as the build that accompanies the source in
> the maintainer's upload) nor built by one of the official buildds to be
> uploaded.
>
> The main re
* Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 17:42]:
> > (I'm not sure what you refer to. The only thing I can think of is
> > possibly Alioth, but I'm not convinced buying a new machine will help
> > at this stage. costa is doing pretty well right now and HP has
> > committed to a new box by
* Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 16:47]:
> The problem isn't there, it's that we're not used to spending Debian
> funds when we need to. This has already been discussed a couple of
> weeks ago :)
Where was this and what should we (have) spent money on?
(I'm not sure what you refer
* Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:04]:
> > Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our new
> > sparc developers. I can't pay to ship them, but if Debian foots the bill,
> > I'll get them to the right ppl.
>
> I'd be willing to help with the shipping bill
* Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:44]:
> > I wonder also, do we still not have some sun donated sparc box
> > running part of our infrastructure ? How will that stay if we drop
> > sparc support ?
> According to db.d.o:
The complete URL is http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi just f
* Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 12:25]:
> >I'm asking because of Lawrence Rosen's ``A Call to Action in
> >OASIS'', which I saw in today's LWN [1]. Apparently OASIS is
>
> >There are a lot of big names [2] at the end of the post, not
> >including our DPL.
Unfortunately I was not c
* Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-23 09:18]:
> > A Call to Action in OASIS
> Debian has a representative in OASIS doesn't it?
Yes (Mark Johnson); I already mailed him to ask for his comments.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-11 15:17]:
> > Is there any progress on this issue?
>
> This seems to be one of your unfrozen mails (1. Aug, huh?). But it is
> still as valid as back then.
My recollection is that all technical concerns were addressed and that
the port would go
* Chasecreek Systemhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-10 20:56]:
> > agreed to set up the machine, host it for a while and give interested
> > developers access. This box is not a general .debian.org
>
> Is this by invitation only?
Debian developers will not automatically get access (since it's
Over the last few weeks, I have been in discussion with Intel about
getting an EM64T system for Debian. They agreed to give a system on
loan to us for 6 months (or possibly longer if we make good use of it)
and after some legal issues were clarified (thanks to Greg Pomerantz
of SPI), the machine i
* Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-05 18:08]:
> Perhaps some folks would be interested in talking about Debian at
> USELINUX in Boston next year? If someone in the Boston area would
> be willing to help organize a Debian BOF and other activities, that
> would be great.
Did anyone submit
* Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-14 13:20]:
> - As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
> are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
> namely mips, mipsel and powerpc.
> I really feel discriminated by this situation.
And it's cle
* Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-16 15:40]:
> > Yes, a fairly powerful machine has recently been donated to Debian and
> > we're currently working out where to host it.
>
> Where is it located?
In the States; not really worth shipping to Germany. However, I'll
see whether we can
* Anthony Towns [2003-11-17 12:48]:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:26:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Since you're posting that as the DPL you're asking for the following
> > reply. Sorry :)
[...]
I'm well aware that redundancy has several benefits. Specifically
about the hardware donations man
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-17 16:15]:
> They will not publish this text on their own webpage, so the only
> way in which we can profit off this is if there is a place on
> www.d.o to publish it. Is there? Or should I tell them that they
> better spend their time doing other stuf
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-16 12:10]:
> > [ Responding to this since I've been BCCed. ]
> Oh, nice. If hadn't been Bcc'ed you wouldn't respond?
I didn't say that; I simply stressed the importance of (B)CCing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to ensure getting a reply from th
[ Responding to this since I've been BCCed. ]
* Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-14 11:34]:
> I´ve been told that this is caused by some toolchain and kernel
> problems on mips that make the buildds running slow.
I talked to Ryan about the mips port about two weeks ago; I'll try to
http://events.kde.org/info/kastle/
|KDE Contributor Conference 2003 - "Kastle"
|22-30 August, 2003
|Nové Hrady, Czech Republic
Which Debian KDE folks will be there? I think this event would be
great for Debian KDE people to interact with upstream.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-25 08:27]:
> Back in April, AMD told us that they could not give us a machine:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01174.html
>
> Perhaps the situation has changed, and we should ping them again?
Digital Network UK and F
* Jamin W. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-21 18:52]:
> > Because the DAM hadn't had a chance to evaluate their application yet?
>
> He hasn't had a chance to review an application that's been waiting on
> him (not an AM or other, but DAM) for over a year? I find that
> extremely laughable.
20 matches
Mail list logo
