vertising during
program execution of a tool or on module load is non-free if it can't be
changed/removed (within the limits of GPL section 2c).
That said, I'd prefer Debian NOT remove such advertising, only that we
guarantee users the right to do.
--
Mark Rafn[EMAIL PROTECTED]<http://www.dagon.net/>
list all of their names. That would be fully within the
> letter of the GPL.
I'm not sure even this is required. It seems reasonable, and I'd expect
most modifiers would do this. However, it may be an "appropriate notice"
to just say "this work is copyright (c) 2003 by multiple authors, see
"AUTHORS" for details.
IANAL, so I don't know where the edge is here.
--
Mark Rafn[EMAIL PROTECTED]<http://www.dagon.net/>
on)
into Debian.
3) It's hard to imagine many non-software items (again,
software=information to me) that can be DSFG-free.
> The important trait of a copyrighted work for Debian is its licensing,
> not what ontological category someone has elected to place it in.
This I also agre
3 matches
Mail list logo
