Time to reply to myself again :)
I went silent in this thread since the end of January because I spent
time fuzzing 8 libraries + CLI front-ends of the DBM family, starting
with LMDB:
> > liblmdb* or libleveldb* are much less popular in popcon by_inst than
> > libdb, yeah...
> >
> >
> > Do we kno
Hi Adrian,
On 1/27/18 1:35 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:25:20PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
>
> Hi Lionel,
>
> > On 1/27/18 6:27 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > ...
> > > There doesn't seem to be any disagreement on th
Hi David,
On 1/27/18 1:12 PM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:49:41PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > > Anyway, the only util in apt-utils making use of libdb is
> > > apt-ftparchive which a) isn't used much in Debian – but by some
> > &
Replying to myself...
On 1/26/18 11:48 PM, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 1/26/18 7:05 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:59:06 PM Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > ---
> > > Do you
Hi Adrian,
On 1/27/18 6:27 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:49:41PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > ...
> > On 1/26/18 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > ...
> > > Finding someone performing the daunting task of actually switching
> >
Hi Guillem,
On 1/27/18 1:42 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 23:59:06 +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > Several days ago, jmm from the security team suggested that I start
> > a discussion on debian-devel about Berkeley DB, which has known
> > security issues,
Hi,
On 1/26/18 11:39 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > In practice, Berkeley DB is a core component of most *nix distros.
> > Debian popcon indicates that libdb5.3 is installed on ~80% of the
> > computers w
Hi Scott,
On 1/26/18 7:05 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:59:06 PM Lionel Debroux wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > ---
> > Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3
> > at a wide scale ? And if so, how to optim
Hi Timo,
On 1/26/18 12:21 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 26.01.2018 00:59, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > ---
> > Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3
> > at a wide scale ? And if so, how to optimize resource usage in
> > general ? :)
>
Hi Marco,
On 1/26/18 1:46 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 25, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > Several days ago, jmm from the security team suggested that I start
> > a discussion on debian-devel about Berkeley DB, which has known
> > security issues, because doing so may ena
Hi Ryan,
On 1/26/18 1:02 AM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59:06PM +0100, Lionel Debroux wrote:
> > the vast majority of the ~170 reverse dependencies of libdb5.3
> > listed by `apt-cache rdepends libdb5.3` on sid will require (much)
> > more work to get r
d packagers do it on their spare
time won't help.
---
Do you think we should start the journey of getting rid of libdb5.3 at a
wide scale ? And if so, how to optimize resource usage in general ? :)
---
TIA and regards,
Lionel Debroux.
[1]
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database
12 matches
Mail list logo
