On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:47:27PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> It was just mentioned "en passant" in a conversation at DebConf that
> bind9 is shipping a root hint file from 2003.
The version of db.root in stretch is from Feb 17, 2016. I suspect that the
comment originates from the fact that I've
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:30:47PM +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote:
> Dear LaMont, dear list,
> is the postfix package still maintained?
> There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
My plans to work on this recently got derailed in dealing with a death
in the family. As it currently sits, I'm
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:37:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:28:11AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > So the question to d-release team (and to the mantainer) is:
> > should/could I NMU a new version with this patch applied?
> That question isn't one the release team real
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
> answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
> Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
Been out for a bit - updated.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > or a bug in some
> > maintainer script or other;
> How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
> an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
In TLA at http://www.dnspython.org/archives/2005-public/dnspython, I've
chatted with upstream about packaging it.
* Package name: dnspython
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* Li
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:37:20AM +0200, Te?filo Ruiz Su?rez wrote:
> El 22-ago-2003 a las 10:03:47, Adrian von Bidder escribi?:
> > And what about postfix? 2.0 is in unstable quite a while and works ok. I
> > guess
> > it will make it to sarge.
> So, what do you think, since you wear the Postfi
3 12:49:35 2002
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+tkstep8.0 (8.0.4p2-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * remove alternative for wish in prerm, per policy. Closes: #126700
+
+ -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 27 Dec 2001 20:57:25 -0700
+
tkstep8.0 (8.0.4p2-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Remo
> I'll be happy to do whatever is required for sendmail, but we also need
> the assistance of (at least - any others?):
> LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> postfix
If someone wants to tell me exactly what to change and how (I haven't
had to deal with alternatives be
I intend to package VMailer (Wietse Venema's mail transport agent, see
http://www.porcupine.org/vmailer). In keeping with Wietse's desires,
the package will not be available until he releases it...
LaMont Jones
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
10 matches
Mail list logo
