Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 6.08.03 um 13:04:41 schrieb Emile van Bergen:
Tab completion or using /Va* is about as fast as /var.
I've considered tab-completion and /Va*, but you must realise that they
work only in the shell.
Neither tab-completion or globbing is available when I'm editing a file
and
Steve Lamb wrote:
I build kernels with alternate compilers all the time. Did you check
the log to see which compiler the kernel actually built with?
Given that I told it to build with 2.95 and it failed in the same manner
as with 3.3 but when I installed 2.95 from Woody which ONLY installs 2
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:32:57AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
This is still quite rare. For instance, in french trains (TGV and
"Teoz", formerly known as "Corail"ie Intercity trains), electric
wires are only available in the most recent coaches and only in 1st
class usua
Herbert Xu wrote:
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also think it would be a good idea for policy to require all
setuid/gid bit grants to go through this or another list for peer
review, much as pre-depends are supposed to.
How about creating a new group for each game?
Umm... With hundreds, p
Sam Hocevar wrote:
I object to this ITP. Not very strongly, but I still object.
I think it's a wonderful idea to have a decss package in Debian. If
Debian cannot distribute the decss that allows Debian users to view DVD
movies (yet), then distributing this one is a good alternative, I'd say.
Chad Walstrom wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:52:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: decss
Like that won't be a confusing package name. ;-p
If you read the website, that was the point ;)
-- Keith
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense.
Could tag them with the release name that affected release name (woody,
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
- it is not in any useful order
So what would be a useful order? Offhand I can't think of one.
Maybe put bugs tagged help first, patch and pending (or some such) last, and
everything else in the middle? Then within these three categories order by
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
You have RFA'd phpgroupware and I've ITA'd it. Waiting until the ugly work (i.e.
the security update to stable) is getting done by others and then popping back
out of your hole to say "April fools
9 matches
Mail list logo
