Hi, all
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> In this package, lcdproc's maintainer is still Jose and Jonathan is listed as
> uploaders.
>
> Is this still valid ?
>
> Jose, so you want to resume maintaining lcdproc or do you want another one to
> take over ?
>
As you prefer. I haven't uploaded any new
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:30:36AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> - For Squeeze: a package "ntpdate" which depends on rdate and
>> provides a wrapper script, used to emulate ntpdate's main functionality
>> (set the system
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Peter Eisentraut (pet...@debian.org):
>
>> Nevertheless, since ntpdate used to be quite popular, I figured I'd better
>> ask
>> here for objections.
>>
>> Would there be a possibility to prove some kind of wrapper for those
>> among our users who might have v
Hi
I was reading through my archived mail and stumbled upon this thread
from over a year ago.
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:48:01PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:40:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> Yep, "waiting for an unrelated
Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800
> Paul Menage wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney
>> wrote:
>>
>>> or /proc/bus/usb or /dev/shm or /dev/pts... :)
>>>
>>>
>> /dev is a bit different though - even if it's mounted as a udev fs,
>> you
Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to seek advice before I perform a mass-bug filing for this
> unstable (though semi-common) use of "sprintf" and "snprintf":
>
> sprintf(buf, "%s foo %d %d", buf, var1, var2);
>
> This is used in many upstreams to perform a format-string-handling
> version of
Nico Golde wrote:
> Yes.
> I see two possibilities here, one option is to get
> 8:2007b~dfsg-1 unblocked and let this migrate to lenny
> (there is some weird SONAME change though) or to reupload a
> +lenny2 version to testing-security again.
>
Yuck!
> Opinions?
>
7:2007b~dfsg-4+lenny2 soun
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Many thanks to José Luis Tallón for proposing to bake cookies, but there
> are already enough cookers in Spain.
Thank you for organizing this all along, and thanks to *all*
contributors, whether they fixed their bugs or not, for helping make a
better free OS for ev
David Paleino wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:12:59 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>
>> Furthermore, m-a is part of the package management system, which is a
>> good thing.
Indeed, as reasoned below
>> [...]
>>
>> Building packages should be the norm. Having many files under /lib that
>> cannot
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven, 2008-09-12 at 11:32 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>> This is a major bug IMHO. It means that at least for i386
>> dkms-generated
>> debs cannot be put in repositories. Thus you require a build
>> environment
>> on the target host.
>>
>
> No. You only need
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> First solution: change the scripts to use a bash function instead of cat
>>> <>> keep going using a FIFO to deal with t
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>> * Package name: mumble
>> Version : 1.1.3
>> Upstream Author : Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
>> *
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
After a full release cycle, it is high time we did.
Having nobody actually using 'progsreiserfs' ---the installations
reported by popcon are certainly due to mistaken installations looking
for 'reiserfsprogs'---, and given that upstream dissapeared
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:27:26 -0200, Fernando M.M. wrote:
>
>
>> Althought i have already seen some old discussion about packing the
>> webmail Roundcube (1) i have not found the package using the
>> package search (2).
>>
> [..]
>
>> Is someone working on it?
>>
Shawn Starr wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Heliodor I won't be including, gtk-window-decorator from compiz is the same
> thing and will work with beryl (im not sure of metacity themes as there are
> issues with this)
>
What about requesting a
Raphaël Pinson wrote:
> Le Dimanche 21 Janvier 2007 21:14, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
>
>> Raphaël Pinson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian
>>> testing because it didn't
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Raphaël Pinson]
>
>> Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian testing
>> because it didn't work. However, this package is largely used and really
>> needs to be present in Debian.
>>
>> After spending some time trying to find a patch, I finally pa
Raphaël Pinson wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Some time ago, libapache-mod-auth-mysql was removed from Debian
> testing because it didn't work. However, this package is largely used
> and really needs to be present in Debian.
>
> After spending some time trying to find a patch, I finally packaged
> the new
Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As Javier noted just after releasing Sarge [1], we need better
> documentation integration tools in Debian. Yes, we have dhelp [2], but it
> lacks loads of features, and it's not what I would call "in shape" [3]. I have
> tried to fix this situati
Hi all,
In agreement with the current maintainer, Jonathan Oxer, I will take
over maintainership of lcdproc. As per his wishes, he will continue to
be co-maintainer (uploader) for the time being.
This is mostly to let ftpmasters know that he has indeed agreed to
these terms so that the up
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 03:13 +0200, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
>
>> Please tell me how in hell can you justify accusing me of not testing my
>> packages, when you have obviously not done so.
>> You seem to have some fixation with uploading,
John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:13:31AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
> Jose,
>
> Before I comment on a few things, I want to make something clear to you.
>
> You have repeatedly accused me of having something personal against you,
> both in public
John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
> thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
> maintaining it for these years.
>
You have a funny sense of time, don't you?
This is true; Years. Since October 2003.
> A
Stephen Frost wrote:
>> If the maintainer still wants to maintain it, help him, do NMUs, whatever,
>> but I'm still looking for one reason you can take over the package against
>> the maintainer's opinion.
>>
>
> He wants to have his name on the package w/o doing the work
> (apparently).
What
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It is the responsibility of a package maintainer to ensure that fixes for
> bugs are uploaded in a timely manner. If José Luis isn't able to do this,
> because he doesn't have a sponsor or for any other reason, then he is not an
> effective maintainer for the package.
>
David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>
>> He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
>> because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
>> personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 10, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
>> objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
>> bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>>> I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
>>> to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
>>>
>> You should not go ahead and remove José from m
flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:42:17PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> I'd rather have you as a co-maintainer.
>> The unfortunate situation is that i have been in the NM queue for more
>> than two years and a half now.
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was considering to
> move our backups to bacula after upgrading our current hardware setup.
> Package updates and bug squashing in general was on the roadmap.
:-)
Bacula (specially 1.38.x is much better... hopefully
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>Hi José,
>
>how about sending this to Frontdesk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or MIA,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of spamming debian-devel with that?
>
>
Thank you for the suggestion. Will do that in the future.
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Stephen.
Having sent you e-mails with my last answers to the Tasks&Skills
stage of the NM process on 2005/10/05, and having received receipt
confirmation from you on 2005/10/18, i still have no answer from you.
Moreover, i have ping'd you
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
>
>Hi,
>
> (Was the direct mail necessary?)
>
>
>
>>Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
>>uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
version) and libstdc++6 (new version,
Lior Kaplan wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* Package name: debian-hebrew
> Version : 1.0.5
> Upstream Author : Yaacov Zamir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>* URL : http://debian-hebrew.alioth.debian.org
>* License : GPL
>
Sven Luther wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
>
>
>
>Ok, but now that sarge is released, what are the plans for etch ? The question
>is if i keep parted without reiserfs support, or if i add it again ?
>
>
If there really is interest in support for Reis
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>Hi Sven...
>
>Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
>stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
>other account and it will work.
>
>
Thanks, Rober... i'll have to remove that i think.
>Jose Luis is in the new
elease is a bit better just by including your work, Bacula -- just
like it is because of the remaining circa nine thousand packages.
Kind regards,
José Luis Tallón
[1] http://packages.debian.org/bacula
[2] http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl? \
searchon=names&
are stable
packages. In fact, they are even categorized under "extra" instead of
"optional", because they are lower priority.
Who is jltallon? adv-solutions.net has no information on its web page
explaining about who they are.
Well, José Luis Tallón (that's me). C
Hi everybody.
I would like to know if Stephen Frost is alright and if he is still
active in any way. He is my Application Manager and i have known nothing
from him since 19th July. He has not even answered my pings on 21st
October, 8&19th November and 29th December, even though i promptly
an
First of all, this package would be a God-send for me (see below)
Note that 'wwwconfig-common' already contains most of the needed
infrastructure... but it is too php-oriented. Splitting it in purely
Apache/PHP-oriented scripts (which would remain as wwwconfig-common) and
a new 'dbconfig-common'
Raphaël 'SurcouF' Bordet wrote:
Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: smarty
Version : 2.6.5
Upstream Author : Monte Ohrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> & Andrei Zmievski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://smarty.php.net/
* License : LGPL
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:31:52AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I would suggest a name like kde-$FOO-style to be used (e.g.,
kde-baghira-style) for packages that provide a widget style for
QT/KDE, and include kwin decoration (if they exist) in the same
package. (*)
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
hi there,
i don't believe i raised an ITP [if i did it was a mistake] but
instead should have raised one of those notifications that the
basket _should_ be packaged. [can't remember what it's called].
RFP. You can submit one of those with 'reportbug'.
Don't worry
ke care of maintaining it as an official package.
Best,
~J.L.
- Original Message
Subject: About Basket packaging status
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 01:40:02 +0200
From: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Luke!
~ How is the BasKet packaging st
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
OK, it's the inquirer
It it was proved to be true, shouldn't we *all* Linux users ( as well as
Stallman plus the FSF as a whole ) sue SCO for copyright infringement ???
That could be *quite funny*
Regards,
J.L.
At 11:36 28/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
We should still discuss an i686 (or i586) optimized port, but fixing
the problem will make it possible to seperate the issues.
Indeed! This is (suppossed to be)? just a first step, in order to solve the
ABI compatibility issue with libstdc++5
An i586/i686 opt
At 12:52 27/04/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 03:56, Chris Cheney wrote:
> I also find it hard to believe that the majority of our users do not
> have or can not purchase a system that is less than 7 years old.
I have a brand new 486-class system with 32MB of RAM. It's less than 6
mon
At 14:17 26/04/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I demand that José Luis Tallón may or may not have written...
> At 19:55 26/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> 1a. create a stripped down version for i386, i.e. required/import
At 19:55 26/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> 1a. create a stripped down version for i386, i.e. required/important
> and go for i486.
Is there much performance improvement in dropping i386 in favour of
i486+?
- Integrated math coprocess
( forgot to Reply to the list, sorry )
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:58:20 +0200
To: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)
At 20:23 21/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Le lun 21/04/2003 à 19:52, José Luis Ta
At 01:18 22/04/2003 +1000, you wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:18, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Why don't we consider the x86-64 as beeing a 64-bits-only architecture
Because we want to run Netscape, commercial games, Frauhofer MP3 en/decoders,
Oracle, and other binary-only i386 software.
If AMD had mad
At 19:10 12/04/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Saturday 12 April 2003 16:58, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> > Every architecture knows where its libraries are installed. One way
> > would be to make 'dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_LIBTYPE' return either
>
53 matches
Mail list logo
