Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2012-11-30)

I just see that propose of removal gnome-dvb-daemon just after I made a RFA to it... Nice! :-D I agree that the problem of gnome-dvb-daemon its related to #674156 as Simon stated. Are all the packages affected by this issue going to be removed from testing? In addition, I will package the newer

Re: [hardening-discuss] Using hardening-wrapper but lintian warning still present

le::Read function, but I have checked all the uses of this StdioFile::Read and it's always safe (always called with "buf" and "sizeof(buf)"). I will test with the "volatile" variable to assert that, and if it is the case, I will add the override, to my debian directory. Thanks very much, you have been very helpful :-) -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Lintian warning: hardening-no-fortify-functions & version numbering

e problem are the "-", but I hope that when uploading to Debian they have a freeze stable version :-D -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Lintian warning: hardening-no-fortify-functions & version numbering

be --tags v0.1.1-27-g55c0f4e Thanks for your quick help :-) -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Lintian warning: hardening-no-fortify-functions & version numbering

ic string after the "git" word... what does it mean? Where can I found some information about packaging directly from VCS? Best regard and thanks in advance -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#675310: ITP: grive -- GNU/Linux client for Google Drive

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "José Luis Segura Lucas" * Package name: grive Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Matchman Green * URL : https://github.com/match065/grive * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: C++ Description : GNU/Linux

Re: Reply to a RFP on the right way

Arno, Steve, thanks you both for the resources and links, it will be very helpful. I know that packaging a library is not the easiest way to start, but I did the packaging of other stuff in the past for my work (not contributed to Debian :-( ). I'm starting the development of a program that

Re: Reply to a RFP on the right way

Thanks, you are the second that make me that suggestion, I already followed it. Thanks to you too :-) El 10/10/11 00:41, Karl Goetz escribió: If you are new to debian packaging, you might find the mentors helpful. http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/ irc://irc.debian.org/debian-mentors than

Reply to a RFP on the right way

Hi. I'm trying to contribute to Debian with a new package. I have searched on the BTS and found that the library I want to package has an open RFP process [1]. I'm not new at all with Debian packaging, but it is my first contribution to Debian project. I want to know what is the right proces