May 2Nd.
Best regards
Johnny Ernst Nielsen :o)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nt releases was versions like 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2.
Not revisions like 2.2r1, 2.2r2, etc.
Best regards
Johnny Ernst Nielsen :o)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l
information about the release procedures.
best regards
Johnny Ernst Nielsen :o)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
find.
> Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> > Debian's current problem with old packages can be seen by the
> > fact that a number of vendors have reportedly dumped the current
> > Stable release in favor of the Testing distribution some time
> > ago. That can only mean
e plenty of new and
updated packages in Unstable waiting to enter the new Testing.
I am thinking in time periods of 4-6 months. A lot happens in 4-6
months, as other distributions prove.
Now it is time for your input.
Best regards
Johnny Ernst Nielsen :o)
[1]
Mention of release cycle problem on Debi
ian-devel mailing list.
I post to policy because I believe it is not a development question,
but rather a policy question. Like the two-week testing cycle is a
policy about how to manage testing.
I thought that since policy discusses policies, this list might be
the proper place for a policy
6 matches
Mail list logo
