Re: Transitioning to Mozilla Firefox 1.0PR

2004-11-09 Thread Johannes Rohr
Hello everyone, I see that five firefox locale packages are still not updated and keep firefox out of testing: mozilla-firefox-locale-eu (0.9+0.7-1) mozilla-firefox-locale-ko (0.9.1) (btw: this looks like a native package which it should not be) mozilla-firefox-locale-nb (0.9.2-4) mozilla-firefox

Re: Transitioning to Mozilla Firefox 1.0PR

2004-10-14 Thread Johannes Rohr
[Cc'ing to debian-devel. Maybe others want to comment on this. Firefox 1.0x is currently kept out of Sid/Sarge because most translations are not yet available. Therefore Sarge is likely to be released with Firefox 0.9.3] Hi, the latest news from my upstream is, that they are not going to releas

Re: PROPOSAL: debian-mozilla@lists.debian.org

2004-10-11 Thread Johannes Rohr
Eduard Bloch schrieb: [...] Dear all, due to the ever increasing number of mozilla-based packages I wonder if it would be a good thing to have a separate debian-mozilla mailing list. Personally I have big difficulties understanding the hacked way What is wrong with an Alioth project, say "m

Re: PROPOSAL: debian-mozilla@lists.debian.org

2004-10-11 Thread Johannes Rohr
Jesus Climent schrieb: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 10:51:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I think that creating a such list is a very good idea. Currently the only way to contact mozilla package's maintainers is to do an apt-cache search mozilla and grep for the email adresses. FYI there is currentl

PROPOSAL: debian-mozilla@lists.debian.org (was: Transitioning to Mozilla Firefox 1.0PR)

2004-10-08 Thread Johannes Rohr
[Cc and reply-to debian-devel] Am 2004.10.08 06:49 schrieb(en) Mike Hommey: On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:24:07AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I remarked that mozilla-firefox is built on hppa using gcc-3.2 (I [...] Dear all, due to the ever increasing number of mozilla-based packages I wonder if i

Re: [mass bug filing?] Short descriptions being used as long descriptions and other policy violations

2003-06-24 Thread Johannes Rohr
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> I was wondering, should I make a mass filing of bugs for those packages >> who fail to produce a proper description? > [...] > > I doubt that just filing bugs without fix makes sense, OTOH > if you planned to submit 10 reports with "the des