On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:00:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The sparc32 port has been struggling for some time. Last month Jurij
> Smakov, currently the most active Debian Sparc porter, raised the question
> if support sparc32 should be dropped for Lenny [1].
Fine, as long as you provide 32-bit
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:10:36PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:05:26AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:15:13PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > > This is a notification of a general resolution proposed on the
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:15:13PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> This is a notification of a general resolution proposed on the
> debian-vote mailing list. On the 8th of February, in a message with
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> propos
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for Oct 22 06:02 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 726
...
> Number that are being ignored: 45
> Number on packages not in testing: 420
> Number concerning the next release (excluding ignored and
I'm trying to figure out the reason why orbit2 is blocked from testing,
see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=orbit2
I understand the problem in principle: there is/are some package/s that
needs the older version of orbit2, and the other "uninstallable"
packages depend on these. Ide
> Well, given you talk about being a pure GPL project, why not put your
> documentation under the GPL as well? Even if you were writing in
> plain text or in a WYSIWYG program, it's a reasonable choice. But
> given you're writing in docbook, with a very clear
> source-compiled-to-object mapping,
Joe Buck wrote:
> > However, the output is redundant in many cases.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Fixed now.
Terrific! I'm impressed at your bug-fixing speed; there's a quick "fixed
now" to almost every issue. This script is a h
Really cool script. Thanks for doing it.
However, the output is redundant in many cases. For example,
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnome-terminal
repeats the same information for libgnome, gnome-vfs2, and other
packages a number of times. This would seem simple to fix: just
8 matches
Mail list logo
