Hi,
often my non-free package does not make the transition to testing
because it is missing builds for some architectures. The buildds of
these architectures are unreliable in the sense that sometimes they
build the package, sometime they don't (try to build it). Therefore, the
package does not m
Hi,
Hello. I noticed Klear (www.klear.org) is missing from
Debian pool. It is pleasant looking DVB digi-TV viewer.
It can be found from Ubuntu. While now I noticed Klear
has freezed, I already listed 50+ feature changes and wishes.
With a couple of changes and with subtitles, Klear
would be nice
Hi,
>> So, I believe I need to provide two versions of libqglviewer - one linked
>> with Qt3 and one with Qt4. I have some doubts about the issue and I'd be
>> glad to hear your advice.
[...]
> you can take a look to libavahi, libpoppler or libqwt:
>
> libqwt5-qt3 - Qt3 widgets library for techni
* Package name: zimpl
Version : 2.04
Upstream Author : Thorsten Koch
* URL : http://www.zib.de/koch/zimpl/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : mathematical modeling language for optimization problems
Zimpl allows the specification of cert
Hi,
>>If the names above are still too generic, I think I will use libcore++ as
>>prefix. Or has anyone else another suggestion?
>
> Why not libexact?
Maybe, but I'd prefer if "core" is part of the package name, because is is
known under this name in the scientific community.
>>I'm a bit uncertai
Hi,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: core
This seems a tad generic, especially since it's a library. Maybe
libcoremath or libcore++?
Hmm, you're right. Does your comment only apply to the source package name
or also to the binary package names? I intend to make the following p
Hi,
why don't autoconf and autoconf2.13 go into testing?
update-excuses says:
autoconf 2.52-2 (currently 2.13-27) (optional) (low)
autoconf uploaded 21 days ago, out of date by 11 days!
autoconf/[all archs]: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf2.13 (>=
2.13-34)
valid
7 matches
Mail list logo
