Re: More advanced home directory creation in Debian?

On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 19:00 -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer > wrote: > > You're aware that not only .bash_* and .profile can be distributed > > by /etc/skel,... but any other config file (e.g. .vimrc) a specific site > > or organisation may

Re: More advanced home directory creation in Debian?

On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 15:42 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like the idea... it would make home-dir creation here at the faculty > a lot more easier. > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:08 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > The location could for example be /etc/skel.d/ > I'd how

Re: dpkg and hardlinks

Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Jerome Warnier > wrote: > >> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: >> >>> Jerome Warnier wrote: >>> >>>> Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>>> >>>>>

Re: dpkg and hardlinks

Steve McIntyre wrote: > In article <49c8dcdb.90...@beeznest.net> you write: > >> Before the upgrade, the file is a hardlink (because I hardlinked it >> manually), then it tries to upgrade the file/hardlink. Does it "break" >> the hardlink* before upgrading the file or does it overwrite the >> fi

Re: dpkg and hardlinks

Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Jerome Warnier wrote: >> Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote: >>> >>>> For files from packages, though, deduplication might be a good >>>> idea, as >>>> dpkg is suppos

Re: dpkg and hardlinks

Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Jerome Warnier] > >> I don't know however how dpkg treats hardlinks. Does it "break" the >> hardlink before replacing a file or does it replace the file whatever >> its real nature is? >> > > You know, given t

Re: dpkg and hardlinks

Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> For files from packages, though, deduplication might be a good idea, as >> dpkg is supposedly the only one to ever modify the files (under /usr for >> example). >> I don't know however

dpkg and hardlinks

Hi guys, I'm currently thinking about deduplication[1] on my Debian systems. As you probably know, the whole thing about deduplication is that replacing files with content with hardlink to other file(s) with the exact same content is sometimes a good idea, at least to regain (uselessly used) disk

Re: Bug#366900: ITP: asterisk-prompt-es-co -- Colombian Spanish voice prompts for the Asterisk PBX

Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 18:33 -0500, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Santiago Ruano Rincón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: asterisk-prompt-es-co > Version : 0.0.20060503 > Upstream Author : Avatar Ltda. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Emphasize teams, not packages

Le samedi 21 janvier 2006 à 10:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > [Jérôme Warnier] > > But why would you want to become a DD if you are not willing to > > maintain a package. Debian is just about maintaining packages. > > Debian needs more than just people maintaining packages. We need > p

Bug#356670: ITP: goupil -- Association membership management tool for GNOME

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: goupil Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://goupil.tuxfamily.org * License : GPL Description :

Bug#341894: ITP: pessulus -- lockdown editor for GNOME

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pessulus Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.gnome.org/~vuntz/pessulus/ * License : GPL Description

Re: device nodes with udev?

Le lundi 07 novembre 2005 à 14:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > On Nov 07, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Wrong. Nothing needs BSD ptys but some *very* old applications (I would > > > not even know where to find one). > > At least /sbin/bootlogd does not work without BSD ptys an

Re: Work-needing packages report for Oct 14, 2005

Le vendredi 14 octobre 2005 à 00:26 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : [..] > The following packages have been orphaned: > >and (#333683), orphaned today [..] I'm maintainer (but still not DD) of this package "and", and the bugreport does not apply to it, still I do not want to orphan it at a

Which CD is a package on?

I wonder if it is possible to find out on which CD of a stable release the package I look for is? I guess it is possible, as apt can do it. But is it available somewhere online? Thanks -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: NFSv4 support absent from mount

Le vendredi 13 mai 2005 à 13:00 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit : > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > As #302420 says, NFSv4 is not supported by current "mount" (part of > > util-linux) in Sarge/Sid while support is present for the ser

NFSv4 support absent from mount

h. Thanks -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Simultaneous loading of e100 and eepro100 by hotplug

doesn't, and debugging this is really hard because the > hardware has gazillions of slightly incompatible variants. Worse: debian kernels 2.4.18 didn't have it yet, and a lot of Woody system probably still have this version. -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest

Re: Which 2.6 kernel for Sarge on a Via C3?

On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:49 +0100, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:33:43PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge > > systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those

Which 2.6 kernel for Sarge on a Via C3?

I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those who didn't know) and can find only -386 and -686 kernels which could possibly match. Somebody knows? Thanks -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest

Re: NMU on sysklogd

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:28 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:56:46AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > In fact, I dug into the problem, and found that the initscript > > (/etc/cron.daily/sysklogd) had a 'reload-or-restart' argument,

Re: NMU on sysklogd

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 09:02 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Jerome Warnier] > > So what? Am I stuck with my problem like so many people are already? And > > a "friendly" takeover of the package? > > I suspect you will discover and get stuck in the power games

Re: NMU on sysklogd

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 00:46 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Jerome Warnier] > > Could someone go through the list and NMU this? I'm willing to help, > > if necessary. > > The maintainer of sysklogd have a problematic relationship with NMUs. > Have a look at bug

NMU on sysklogd

"log analysis tool" I mean anything relying on files in /var/log to do something. I notice that that package has a huge number of bugs, with many having a patch attached, but many bugs are really old. Could someone go through the list and NMU this? I'm willing to help, if necessary

Re: Bug#278027: RFP: ibm-acpi -- Driver for IBM laptops to extend ACPI support

onfiguration files in /etc/acpi. Shouldn't it be integrated to package "acpid" then? > Cheers > David -- Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BeezNest s.a r.l.